首页> 外文期刊>European journal of public health >GULiVER-travelling into the heart of good doctor-patient communication from a patient perspective: Study protocol of an international multicentre study
【24h】

GULiVER-travelling into the heart of good doctor-patient communication from a patient perspective: Study protocol of an international multicentre study

机译:从患者的角度出发,GULiVER成为良好的医患沟通的核心:一项国际多中心研究的研究方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The project GULiVer explores how lay people in Belgium (Gent), the Netherlands (Utrecht), the UK (Liverpool) and Italy (Verona) evaluate physicians' communicative skills. The aims are to present the study design and to assess the quality of collected data. Methods: In each centre one out of two sets of four videotaped consultations involving medical students with varying communication skills were shown to eight lay panels of six to nine participants each (n=259). The selection of lay participants was stratified by gender and age in order to obtain a heterogeneous sample. Background characteristics included socio-demographic participants' general physical (COOP-WONCA) and mental health (GHQ), communication preferences (QUOTE-com) and trust in doctors (TMP). Participants were asked to give quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the student doctors' performance in a mixed-methods design. Quality assessment of the collected data and protocol adherence of the four centres was carried out by Generalized Linear Model (GLM). Results: The overall sample comprised 259 participants. Participants were equally distributed among the centres and balanced in terms of ag gender and OSCE scenari confirming the quality of collected data. Conclusion: The study design and the applied procedures will ensure a great richness of data allowing a wider European perspective on lay persons' view assessed both individually and through focus group discussion.
机译:背景:GULiVer项目探索比利时(根特),荷兰(乌得勒支),英国(利物浦)和意大利(维罗纳)的外行人如何评估医师的沟通能力。目的是提出研究设计并评估所收集数据的质量。方法:在每个中心,由四名参加过录像会议,有不同沟通技巧的医学学生进行的四次会诊中,有八次由六个到九名参与者组成(n = 259),由四名专家组成。为了获得不同样本,按性别和年龄对非专业参与者的选择进行了分层。背景特征包括社会人口统计学参与者的总体身体状况(COOP-WONCA)和精神健康(GHQ),沟通偏好(QUOTE-com)和对医生的信任(TMP)。要求参与者在混合方法设计中对学生医生的表现进行定量和定性评估。通过通用线性模型(GLM)对四个中心的收集数据和协议遵守情况进行了质量评估。结果:总体样本包括259名参与者。参与者在各中心之间平均分配,并且在性别和OSCE情景方面保持平衡,从而确认了所收集数据的质量。结论:研究设计和应用程序将确保大量的数据,从而使欧洲可以更广泛地从外行角度对外行人的观点进行单独评估和通过焦点小组讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号