...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Haematology >Poor correlations between measurements of bone quality by quantitative ultrasound sonography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with beta-thalassaemia major.
【24h】

Poor correlations between measurements of bone quality by quantitative ultrasound sonography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with beta-thalassaemia major.

机译:重型β地中海贫血患者通过定量超声检查骨质量测量结果与双能X线骨密度仪之间的相关性较差。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Osteopenia/osteoporosis is a major component of morbidity even in young patients with beta-thalassaemia major. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference method for determining bone mineral density (BMD). Quantitative ultrasound sonography (QUS) for bone measurement is a relatively new, inexpensive and radiation-free method that could serve as an alternative to DXA. Our aim was to assess bone status in thalassaemic patients both with QUS and DXA and, consequently, to investigate the degree of correlation between the two methods. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (15 male and 18 female) with beta-thalassaemia major, regularly transfused and systematically iron-chelated, participated in the study. Mean age was 22.0 +/- 8.0 yr (range: 6.5-41.0 yr). All patients were evaluated with QUS at radius and tibia and had DXA scan at lumbar spine vertebrae (L2-L4), whereas 20 patients were additionally assessed with DXA at the left hip (femoral neck, trochanter region and Ward's triangle). RESULTS: Results were expressed as Z-scores compared with sex- and age-matched population. Lowest mean Z-scores measured with DXA were recorded at lumbar spine and Ward's triangle (-1.1 +/- 1.13 and -0.95 +/- 1.07, respectively). Lowest mean QUS-derived Z-scores were measured at radius, statistically significant compared with Z-scores measured at tibia (-0.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 0.4 +/- 1.1, P < 0.001). QUS measurements at radius were significantly correlated to QUS measurements at tibia (r = 0.51, P = 0.002). The latter were correlated to BMD measured at lumbar spine (r = 0.516, P = 0.002) and at trochanter region (r = 0.646, P = 0.003). All BMD measurements at hip were significantly correlated to each other. Lumbar spine BMD was correlated to BMD at femoral neck (r = 0.607, P = 0.003) and to BMD at Ward's triangle (r = 0.438, P = 0.027). Finally, no agreement was recorded between the two methods in identifying thalassaemic patients at risk for osteoporosis (kappa = 0.203, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Quantitative ultrasound sonography could not serve as an alternate to DXA.
机译:目的:即使在年轻的重型β地中海贫血患者中,骨质减少/骨质疏松症也是发病率的主要组成部分。双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)是确定骨矿物质密度(BMD)的参考方法。用于骨骼测量的定量超声超声检查(QUS)是一种相对较新,便宜且无辐射的方法,可以替代DXA。我们的目的是评估QUS和DXA的地中海贫血患者的骨骼状态,并因此研究两种方法之间的相关程度。方法:33例重度β地中海贫血的患者(男15例,女18例)定期输注并系统铁螯合,参加了该研究。平均年龄为22.0 +/- 8.0岁(范围:6.5-41.0岁)。所有患者均接受radius骨和胫骨QUS评估,并在腰椎(L2-L4)进行DXA扫描,而另外20例患者在左髋(股骨颈,转子区和沃德三角形)进行DXA评估。结果:与性别和年龄相匹配的人群相比,结果以Z分数表示。用DXA测量的最低平均Z得分记录在腰椎和沃德三角形处(分别为-1.1 +/- 1.13和-0.95 +/- 1.07)。 QUS衍生的最低Z分数是在半径处测得的,与胫骨处的Z分数相比有统计学意义(-0.6 +/- 1.1与0.4 +/- 1.1,P <0.001)。半径处的QUS测量值与胫骨处的QUS测量值显着相关(r = 0.51,P = 0.002)。后者与腰椎(r = 0.516,P = 0.002)和大转子区域(r = 0.646,P = 0.003)测得的BMD相关。髋部的所有BMD测量值均显着相关。腰椎骨密度与股骨颈骨密度相关(r = 0.607,P = 0.003),与沃德三角形骨密度相关(r = 0.438,P = 0.027)。最后,在鉴定有骨质疏松风险的地中海贫血患者中,两种方法之间没有记录一致(kappa = 0.203,P = 0.04)。结论:超声定量超声不能替代DXA。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号