首页> 外文期刊>European journal of gastroenterology and hepatology >Peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a monotherapy in early virological responders and peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a, ribavirin and amantadine triple therapy in early virological nonres
【24h】

Peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a monotherapy in early virological responders and peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin versus peginterferon alpha-2a, ribavirin and amantadine triple therapy in early virological nonres

机译:在早期病毒学应答者中,聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a和利巴韦林与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a单药治疗以及在早期病毒学非反应性中聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a和利巴韦林与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a,利巴韦林和金刚烷胺三联疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) treatment schedules on the basis of an early virological response (EVR), defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA (<50 IU/ml) after a 12-week induction course of peginterferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) 180 mcg/week. METHODS: A total of 210 interferon-naive patients (69% male; median age, 42 years) with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C infection (genotype 1: 62%) received PEG-IFN 180 mcg/week for 12 weeks. Patients with EVR (58%) were randomized to continue PEG-IFN monotherapy (n=64) or to add ribavirin (RBV), 800 mg/day (n=57), for 36 additional weeks. Patients without EVR (42%) were randomized to add RBV (n=42), or RBV plus amantadine, 200 mg/day (n=47), for 36 additional weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV-RNA 24 weeks after treatment completion) was compared among treatment groups. RESULTS: Patients with EVR: SVR rate was 60.3% in the PEG-IFN group versus 67.2% in the PEG-IFN+RBV group (NS). In genotypes 2/3, SVR rates were 66.7 versus 73.1% (NS); in genotypes 1/4, SVR rates were 51.6 versus 61.3%, respectively (NS). Patients without EVR: SVR was 16.7% in the PEG-IFN+RBV group versus 31.9% in the triple therapy group (P=0.07). In patients with genotypes 1/4, SVR rates were 9.4 versus 29.7% (P=0.041). CONCLUSION: In genotypes 1/4 patients without EVR, triple therapy results in higher SVR rates than standard dual therapy. This study confirms that addition of amantadine is beneficial in early-recognized 'difficult-to-treat' patients.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是在早期病毒学应答(EVR)的基础上比较抗丙型肝炎病毒(anti-HCV)治疗方案的疗效,EVR定义为无法检测到的血清HCV-RNA(<50 IU / ml ),在接受聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a(PEG-IFN)诱导12周后的180 mcg /周。方法:经组织学证实为慢性丙型肝炎(基因型1:62%)的210名初次接受干扰素的患者(男性占69%;中位年龄42岁)接受PEG-IFN 180 mcg /周治疗12周。 EVR患者(58%)被随机分组​​,继续进行PEG-IFN单药治疗(n = 64)或添加病毒唑(RBV),每天800 mg /天(n = 57),持续36周。无EVR(42%)的患者被随机分配以RBV(n = 42)或RBV加金刚烷胺200 mg /天(n = 47),持续36周。比较各治疗组的持续病毒学应答(SVR,治疗完成后24周未检测到HCV-RNA)。结果:EVR患者:PEG-IFN组的SVR率为60.3%,而PEG-IFN + RBV组(NS)的SVR率为67.2%。在基因型2/3中,SVR发生率为66.7,而同期为73.1%(NS);在1/4的基因型中,SVR的发生率分别为51.6%和61.3%(NS)。没有EVR的患者:PEG-IFN + RBV组的SVR为16.7%,而三联疗法组的SVR为31.9%(P = 0.07)。在基因型为1/4的患者中,SVR率为9.4对29.7%(P = 0.041)。结论:在没有EVR的基因型1/4患者中,三联疗法导致的SVR率高于标准双联疗法。这项研究证实,金刚烷胺的添加对早期识别的“难治性”患者有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号