...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of forest research >Governance issues in the Ecosystem Approach: what lessons from the Forest Stewardship Council? (Special Issue: Socio-economics in forestry.)
【24h】

Governance issues in the Ecosystem Approach: what lessons from the Forest Stewardship Council? (Special Issue: Socio-economics in forestry.)

机译:生态系统方法中的治理问题:森林管理委员会的哪些教训? (特刊:林业的社会经济学。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The certification scheme of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Ecosystem Approach (EA) as conceptualised under the Convention on Biological Diversity show substantial convergence in their broader aims and normative background. Taking this finding as a starting point, the paper discusses what lessons could be learned from FSC's experience in developing and implementing specific norms and standards. The elaborate decision-making mechanisms of FSC may prove useful for the refinement and implementation of the EA, in particular regarding the transformation of generic principles into national and regional level standards. FSC's strong reliance on market mechanisms, however, and the related influence of dominant economic actors limit its suitability as an overall blueprint for the implementation of the EA.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0350-y
机译:根据《生物多样性公约》概念化的森林管理委员会(FSC)和生态系统方法(EA)的认证计划在其更广泛的目标和规范背景方面显示出实质性的融合。本文以这一发现为起点,讨论了可以从FSC在制定和实施特定规范和标准方面的经验中学到什么。 FSC精心制定的决策机制可能对完善和实施EA有用,尤其是在将通用原则转变为国家和地区标准方面。然而,FSC高度依赖市场机制,以及主要经济参与者的相关影响限制了其作为实施EA的总体蓝图的适用性。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009- 0350年

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号