首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pediatrics >Glycopeptide prescribing in a tertiary referral paediatric hospital and applicability of hospital infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC) guidelines to children.
【24h】

Glycopeptide prescribing in a tertiary referral paediatric hospital and applicability of hospital infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC) guidelines to children.

机译:糖肽在三级转诊儿科医院中的处方以及医院感染控制实践咨询委员会(HICPAC)指南对儿童的适用性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study was undertaken to investigate the frequency of, indications for and appropriateness of glycopeptide prescription in a paediatric tertiary referral hospital and to assess the usefulness of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) guidelines. A prospective audit of all systemic glycopeptide prescriptions over a 2-month period was undertaken. Clinical and microbiological data were recorded. Of 2810 hospital admissions, systemic IV glycopeptides were prescribed on 57 occasions to 50 patients, 30 (52.6%) for vancomycin and 27 (47.4%) for teicoplanin. Prescriptions were for 34 males and 23 females aged from 2 weeks to 11 years (mean 15 months; median 9 months). Median hospital stay was 50 days. Glycopeptides were given to the following patient groups: cardiology 7 (12%), prophylaxis for cardiac surgery 11 (19%), post-cardiac surgery 1 (1.8%), oncology 14 (24.6%), post-gastrointestinal tract surgical 8 (14%), general surgical 9 (15. 8%) and medical 7 (12.3%). Twenty three children (41.8%) had central lines in situ. Reason for use of glycopeptide was therapeutic in 7 (12.3%), empiric in 38 (66.7%), and as prophylaxis in 12 (21.1%). Eight (14%) prescriptions met strict HICPAC criteria, but a further 22 (39%) prescriptions were considered appropriate in this high-risk population. Glycopeptides were chosen appropriately for cardiac surgery prophylaxis in a further 10 (18%) but timing and duration of use in this group was inappropriate. Of all prescriptions, use was empiric in 38 (76%) and appropriate cultures were obtained at the time of commencement in only 13 (34%) of these. Glycopeptides were not used for routine surgical prophylaxis or for first-line empiric treatment of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: The strict implementation of HICPAC guidelines may not always be appropriate for children at risk of beta-lactam resistant gram-positive infections. Hospital guidelines need to be tailored to the patient population and microbial susceptibility patterns of each institution. Appropriate cultures should be obtained at the time glycopeptide treatment is begun so that duration of exposure can be limited.
机译:进行这项研究是为了调查小儿转诊医院糖肽处方的使用频率,适应症和适用性,并评估医院感染控制实践咨询委员会(HICPAC)指南的实用性。在2个月内对所有系统性糖肽处方进行了前瞻性审核。记录临床和微生物学数据。在2810例入院患者中,有50次对57例患者使用了全身性IV糖肽处方,万古霉素30例(52.6%)和替考拉宁27例(47.4%)。处方年龄为2周至11岁(平均15个月;中位数9个月)的34例男性和23例女性。住院中位时间为50天。糖肽用于以下患者组:心脏病学7(12%),预防心脏外科手术11(19%),心脏外科手术1(1.8%),肿瘤科14(24.6%),胃肠道外科手术8( 14%),普通外科手术9(15. 8%)和医疗7(12.3%)。 23名儿童(41.8%)拥有原位中央线。使用糖肽的原因是治疗性的(72.3%)(12.3%),经验性的38例(66.7%)和12例(21.1%)的预防性使用。 8份(14%)处方符合严格的HICPAC标准,但又有22份(39%)处方被认为适合此高风险人群。糖肽还适当选择了10种(18%)用于预防心脏手术,但该组的使用时间和持续时间不合适。在所有处方中,有38种(76%)是经验性的,开始使用时只有13种(34%)获得了适当的培养。糖肽不用于常规外科手术预防或用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症的一线经验治疗。结论:严格执行HICPAC指南可能并不总是适用于有β-内酰胺耐药性革兰氏阳性感染风险的儿童。医院指南需要针对每个机构的患者人群和微生物敏感性模式进行调整。开始糖肽治疗时应获得适当的培养物,以限制暴露时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号