首页> 外文期刊>European journal of pain : >Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: development and validation of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ).
【24h】

Fear-avoidance- and endurance-related responses to pain: development and validation of the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ).

机译:恐惧回避和耐力相关的疼痛反应:回避耐力问卷(AEQ)的开发和验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIM OF INVESTIGATION: Recent research indicated wide variability regarding pain-related cognitive/affective and behavioral responses to pain, showing that fear-avoidance responses (FAR) and endurance-responses (ER) play a prominent role in the maintenance of low back pain (LBP). Until now, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments covering FAR and ER. METHODS: A pool of 60 items, derived from the Kiel Pain Inventory was answered by 191 LBP patients. Principle components analyses (PCA) was used to explore the factor structure creating the Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire (AEQ). Validity was calculated using the criteria variables pain intensity, disability, chronic pain grades (CPG) and number of sick days, further self-report measures (Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire FABQ, Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale PASS, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia TSK and Beck Depression Inventory BDI) evaluating construct validity. RESULTS: PCA revealed five AEQ-FAR scales with anxiety/depression, catastrophizing, help-/hopelessness, avoidance of social activities, avoidance of physical activities, and four AEQ-ER scales with positive mood, thought suppression, pain persistence behavior and humor/distraction. All scales revealed high internal consistency. As expected, FAR scales showed positive associations with pain, disability and other FAR variables (correlations between r=.26 and r=.58), whereas ER scales showed negative associations (between r=-.19 and -.48). The only exception referred to positive correlations between both, FAR and ER and pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The AEQ has shown as a reliable and valid measure to assess pattern of fear-avoidance and endurance-related responses to pain. Both aspects seem to play a role in the maintenance of LBP.
机译:调查的目的:最近的研究表明,在疼痛相关的疼痛相关认知/情感和行为反应方面存在很大差异,表明恐惧回避反应(FAR)和耐力反应(ER)在维持下腰痛方面起着重要作用( LBP)。到目前为止,还缺乏可靠的有效的FAR和ER工具。方法:191位LBP患者回答了从基尔疼痛清单中得到的60项内容。主成分分析(PCA)用于探索创建回避耐力问卷(AEQ)的因素结构。使用以下标准变量来计算有效性:疼痛强度,残疾,慢性疼痛等级(CPG)和患病天数,进一步的自我报告措施(恐惧回避信念问卷FABQ,疼痛焦虑症状量表PASS,坦帕氏运动恐惧症TSK和Beck量表)抑郁量表(BDI)评估构建体的有效性。结果:PCA揭示了五种AEQ-FAR量表,其中包括焦虑/抑郁,灾难性,帮助/无望,避免社交活动,避免体力活动,以及四种AEQ-ER量表,具有积极情绪,思想抑制,持续性疼痛和幽默/分心。所有量表均显示出较高的内部一致性。正如预期的那样,FAR量表显示出与疼痛,残疾和其他FAR变量呈正相关(r = .26和r = .58之间的相关性),而ER量表显示出负相关性(r =-。19和-.48之间)。唯一的例外是FAR和ER与疼痛强度之间呈正相关。结论:AEQ已显示为评估避免恐惧和耐力相关的疼痛反应方式的可靠有效方法。这两个方面似乎都在LBP的维持中起作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号