...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical pharmacology >Do medical students copy the drug treatment choices of their teachers or do they think for themselves?
【24h】

Do medical students copy the drug treatment choices of their teachers or do they think for themselves?

机译:医学生会复制老师的药物治疗选择还是自己思考?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: Although the importance of rational prescribing is generally accepted, the teaching of pharmacotherapy to undergraduate medical students is still unsatisfactory. Because clinical teachers are an important role model for medical students, it is of interest to know whether this extends to therapeutic decision-making. The aim of this study was to find out which factors contribute to the drug choices made by medical students and their teachers (general practitioners and clinical specialists). METHODS: Final-year medical students (n = 32), and general practitioners (n = 29), lung specialists (n = 26), orthopaedic surgeons (n = 24), and internists (n = 24) serving as medical teachers from all eight medical schools in the Netherlands participated in the study. They were asked to prescribe treatment (drug or otherwise) for uncomplicated (A) and complicated (B) written patient cases and to indicate which factors influenced their choice of treatment, using a list of factors reported in the literature to influence drug prescribing. RESULTS: Final-year medical students primarily based their drug choice on the factors 'effectiveness of the drugs' and 'examples from medical teachers'. In contrast, clinical teachers primarily based their drug choice on the factors 'clinical experience', 'effectiveness of the drugs', 'side effects of the drugs', 'standard treatment guidelines', and 'scientific literature'. CONCLUSIONS: Medical teachers would appear to base their drug choice mainly on clinical experience and drug-related factors, whereas final-year medical students base their drug choice mainly on examples provided by their medical teachers. It is essential that medical teachers clearly explain to their students how they arrive at a specific choice of medication since medical students tend to copy the therapeutic drug choices from their teachers, mainly because of a lack of experience. Presenting students with clinical therapeutic problems early during undergraduate training will not only give them a chance to gain experience in solving medical problems but will also give meaning to what they are studying as opposed to merely reproducing what they learn or copying what they are told.
机译:目的:尽管理性处方的重要性已被普遍接受,但对医学专业的本科生进行药物疗法的教学仍然不能令人满意。由于临床教师是医学生的重要榜样,因此有兴趣知道这是否扩展到治疗决策上。这项研究的目的是找出哪些因素有助于医学生及其老师(全科医生和临床专家)做出的药物选择。方法:医学专业的最后一年的医学生(n = 32)和全科医生(n = 29),肺科专家(n = 26),整形外科医生(n = 24)和内科医师(n = 24)是来自荷兰的所有八所医学院都参加了这项研究。他们被要求对未复杂(A)和复杂(B)的书面病人开出药物治疗方法(药物或其他方法),并使用文献中报道的一系列影响药物处方的因素来表明哪些因素影响他们的治疗选择。结果:最后一年的医学生主要基于“药物的有效性”和“医学老师的例子”因素来选择药物。相反,临床教师主要根据“临床经验”,“药物的有效性”,“药物的副作用”,“标准治疗指南”和“科学文献”的因素来选择药物。结论:医学老师的药物选择似乎主要基于临床经验和与药物相关的因素,而最后一年的医学生的药物选择则主要基于他们的医学老师提供的例子。由于医学生倾向于从老师那里复制治疗药物的选择,这主要是由于缺乏经验,因此医学老师必须向学生清楚地向他们解释如何选择特定的药物,这是至关重要的。在本科阶段的早期培训中向学生展示临床治疗问题,不仅使他们有机会获得解决医学问题的经验,而且还将赋予他们正在学习的内容以意义,而不是仅仅复制他们所学的内容或复制所告诉的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号