...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study.
【24h】

Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: interlaboratory study.

机译:食品血糖指数的测定:实验室间研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: Practical use of the glycaemic index (GI), as recommended by the FAO/WHO, requires an evaluation of the recommended method. Our purpose was to determine the magnitude and sources of variation of the GI values obtained by experienced investigators in different international centres. DESIGN:: GI values of four centrally provided foods (instant potato, rice, spaghetti and barley) and locally obtained white bread were determined in 8-12 subjects in each of seven centres using the method recommended by FAO/WHO. Data analysis was performed centrally. SETTING:: University departments of nutrition. SUBJECTS:: Healthy subjects (28 male, 40 female) were studied. RESULTS:: The GI values of the five foods did not vary significantly in different centres nor was there a significant centrexfood interaction. Within-subject variation from two centres using venous blood was twice that from five centres using capillary blood. The s.d. of centre mean GI values was reduced from 10.6 (range 6.8-12.8) to 9.0 (range 4.8-12.6) by excluding venous blood data. GI values were not significantly related to differences in method of glucose measurement or subject characteristics (age, sex, BMI, ethnicity or absolute glycaemic response). GI values for locally obtained bread were no more variable than those for centrally provided foods. CONCLUSIONS:: The GI values of foods are more precisely determined using capillary than venous blood sampling, with mean between-laboratory s.d. of approximately 9.0. Finding ways to reduce within-subject variation of glycaemic responses may be the most effective strategy to improve the precision of measurement of GI values.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2003) 57, 475-482. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601551
机译:目的::按照粮农组织/世卫组织的建议,实际使用血糖指数需要对推荐的方法进行评估。我们的目的是确定由不同国际中心的经验丰富的调查员获得的GI值的变化幅度和来源。设计:在七个中心的每个中心的8-12位受试者中,采用FAO / WHO推荐的方法确定了四种集中提供的食物(即食土豆,米饭,意大利面条和大麦)和当地获得的白面包的GI值。集中进行数据分析。地点:大学营养系。研究对象:健康受试者(男28例,女40例)。结果:在不同的中心,这五种食物的GI值没有显着差异,也没有明显的中心与食物的相互作用。使用静脉血的两个中心的受试者内部差异是使用毛细管血的五个中心的受试者内部差异的两倍。 s.d.通过排除静脉血数据,中心平均GI值的平均值从10.6(范围6.8-12.8)降低到9.0(范围4.8-12.6)。 GI值与血糖测量方法或受试者特征(年龄,性别,BMI,种族或绝对血糖反应)的差异无显着相关。当地获得的面包的GI值与集中提供的食物的GI值相同。结论:与静脉血取样相比,毛细管法测定食物的GI值更为精确,实验室之间的平均值为s.d。约9.0。寻找减少受试者血糖反应变化的方法可能是提高GI值测量精度的最有效策略.European Journal of Clinical Nutrition(2003)57,475-482。 doi:10.1038 / sj.ejcn.1601551

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号