首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: Official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology >Phenotypic detection of plasmid-acquired AmpC in Escherichia coli - Evaluation of screening criteria and performance of two commercial methods for the phenotypic confirmation of AmpC production
【24h】

Phenotypic detection of plasmid-acquired AmpC in Escherichia coli - Evaluation of screening criteria and performance of two commercial methods for the phenotypic confirmation of AmpC production

机译:表型检测质粒在大肠杆菌中获得的AmpC-评价筛选标准和两种商业方法对AmpC生产的表型确认

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The phenotypic detection of plasmid-acquired AmpC (pAmpC) in Escherichia coli is challenging, and molecular methods are required for confirmation. In addition to cefoxitin resistance, multiresistance and high-level resistance to cephalosporins have both been suggested as criteria for targeting isolates with pAmpC, but data to support these proposed criteria are lacking. A Swedish collection of 378 isolates with either putative chromosomal hyperproduction of AmpC (cAmpC) or pAmpC were subjected to disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination with the Etest. The frequency of resistance to gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim among cAmpC and pAmpC was compared to elucidate the issue of multidrug resistance. Lastly, methods for the phenotypic confirmation of pAmpC were compared. One in-house disk diffusion method, one method employing NeoSensitabs (Rosco), and one Etest method (bioMérieux) were compared. The analysis of histograms based on both disk diffusion and the Etest showed that resistance [according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)] to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime occurred in almost all isolates. By coining resistance instead of non-susceptibility, the number of isolates required to subject to phenotypic testing/genotypic confirmation dropped by more than 40 %, without compromising the sensitivity substantially. Further, almost 70 % of isolates with pAmpC were non-multidrug resistant, clearly indicating that this is an inappropriate criterion for further investigation. The phenotypic tests all had more than 90 % sensitivity, and the best sensitivities were obtained with the in-house method and with the ceftazidime ± cloxacillin NeoSensitab. In conclusion, clinical resistance to cefotaxime and/or ceftazidime seems to be an appropriate criterion for pAmpC screening, and several phenotypic methods perform well for the phenotypic confirmation of AmpC production prior to genotypic confirmation.
机译:在大肠杆菌中对质粒获得的AmpC(pAmpC)进行表型检测具有挑战性,需要使用分子方法进行确认。除了对头孢西丁的耐药性以外,对头孢菌素的多药耐药性和高水平耐药性都已被建议作为靶向分离物与pAmpC的标准,但缺乏支持这些拟议标准的数据。瑞典的378个分离株的推定染色体高产AmpC(cAmpC)或pAmpC的分离株经过磁盘扩散和Etest测定最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。比较了cAmpC和pAmpC对庆大霉素,环丙沙星和甲氧苄啶的耐药频率,以阐明多药耐药性问题。最后,比较了pAmpC的表型确认方法。比较了一种内部磁盘扩散方法,一种采用NeoSensitabs(Rosco)的方法和一种Etest方法(bioMérieux)。基于圆盘扩散和Etest的直方图分析表明,[根据欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)的抗药性]几乎所有分离株均出现了对头孢噻肟和/或头孢他啶的耐药性。通过创造抗性而不是非敏感性,进行表型测试/基因型确认所需的分离株数量减少了40%以上,而丝毫没有损害灵敏度。此外,将近70%的带有pAmpC的分离株是非多药耐药的,这清楚地表明这是进一步研究的不适当标准。表型测试均具有超过90%的敏感性,并且采用内部方法和头孢他啶±氯西林NeoSensitab可获得最佳敏感性。总之,对头孢噻肟和/或头孢他啶的临床耐药性似乎是pAmpC筛查的适当标准,在确定基因型之前,几种表型方法对AmpC生产的表型确认表现良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号