首页> 外文期刊>European journal of clinical nutrition >Resting metabolic rate, body composition and aerobic fitness comparisons between active and sedentary 54-71 year old males.
【24h】

Resting metabolic rate, body composition and aerobic fitness comparisons between active and sedentary 54-71 year old males.

机译:活跃和久坐的54-71岁男性的静息代谢率,身体成分和有氧适应性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that 55-70 y old male longterm exercisers (LE) have higher resting metabolic rates (RMR) than longterm nonexercisers (LNE). DESIGN: A power analysis demonstrated that this cross-sectional study required 12 subjects per group to detect a 10% RMR difference (kJ x kg FFM(-1) x d(-1)) between the LE and LNE (power = 0.8;alpha = 0.05). SUBJECTS: Twelve LE (X +/- s.d.; 63.5+/-3.4 y; 1.75+/-0.06 m; 69.01+/-8.24 kg; 20.4+/-4.9 %BF) and 12 LNE (63.6+/-5.6 y; 1.72+/-0.07 m; 79.44 12.4 kg; 29.6 4.4 %BF) were recruited from advertisements placed in a newspaper and on university and community noticeboards. INTERVENTIONS: Measurements were conducted for: RMR using the Douglas bag technique; body composition via a four compartment model which is based on determination of body density, total body water and bone mineral mass; and aerobic fitness using a submaximal work test on a cycle ergometer. RESULTS: The LE (93.00+/-7.16 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1)) registered a significantly greater (P = 0.04) RMR than the LNE (84.70+/-11.23 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1)) when energy expenditure was expressed relative to body mass, but this difference disappeared (P = 0.55) when the data were corrected for the non-zero intercept of the graph of RMR (MJ/d) against body mass. ANCOVA with FFM as the covariate also indicated that the RMR (MJ/d) difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.28). The adjusted means for the LE and LNE were 6.39 and 6.62 MJ/d, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There are no RMR (MJ/d) differences between LE and LNE 54-71 y old males when statistical control is exerted for the effect of FFM and the higher value of the former group for RMR normalised to body mass disappears when this ratio is corrected for statistical bias.
机译:目的:检验55-70岁的男性长期锻炼者(LE)比长期非锻炼者(LNE)具有更高的静息代谢率(RMR)的假设。设计:功效分析表明,该横断面研究每组需要12名受试者才能检测出LE和LNE之间的RMR差异(kJ x kg FFM(-1)xd(-1))为10%(功效= 0.8;α = 0.05)。受试者:十二个LE(X +/- sd; 63.5 +/- 3.4 y; 1.75 +/- 0.06 m; 69.01 +/- 8.24 kg; 20.4 +/- 4.9%BF)和12 LNE(63.6 +/- 5.6 y) ; 1.72 +/- 0.07 m; 79.44 12.4 kg; 29.6 4.4%BF)是从报纸上以及大学和社区布告栏上的广告中招募的。干预措施:使用道格拉斯袋技术对RMR进行了测量;通过四室模型确定身体成分,该模型基于确定的身体密度,体内总水分和骨矿物质质量;自行车测功机上的次最大工作测试来进行有氧健身。结果:LE(93.00 +/- 7.16 kJ x kg(-1)xd(-1))的RMR显着大于LNE(84.70 +/- 11.23 kJ x kg(-1)xd)(P = 0.04) (-1))表示相对于体重的能量消耗,但是当针对RMR(MJ / d)图相对于体重的非零截距校正数据时,该差异消失(P = 0.55)。以FFM作为协变量的ANCOVA还表明,两组之间的RMR(MJ / d)差异无统计学意义(P = 0.28)。 LE和LNE的调整平均值分别为6.39和6.62 MJ / d。结论:当对FFM的效果进行统计学控制时,LE和LNE 54-71岁的男性之间的RMR(MJ / d)没有差异,而当该比例RMR标准化为体重时,前一组的较高值消失了已针对统计偏差进行了校正。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号