...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Audibility of anaesthesia alarms during magnetic resonance imaging: should we be alarmed?
【24h】

Audibility of anaesthesia alarms during magnetic resonance imaging: should we be alarmed?

机译:磁共振成像过程中麻醉警报的可听性:我们应该被警报吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effects of MRI acoustic noise on anaesthesia safety concerns have not yet been documented. The objectives of this study were to provide subjective and objective evaluations of anaesthesia alarm audibility during MRI and to review the literature to determine whether or not to worry about our results. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board's approval, we tested the audibility of four anaesthesia equipment alarms and selected one of them. Additionally, we selected the least audible of three MRI sequences (spin echo) for the study. The evaluations were conducted inside and outside the scanning room in a subjective and objective manner. First, 20 normal hearing consenting adult volunteers rated their audibility of the anaesthesia alarm using a 10-point numerical scale (0 = not audible to 10 = maximum audibility). Second, a sound level meter was used to measure the intensity of acoustic noise (A-weighted scale) under the above-mentioned conditions. Data, expressed as median [interquartile range], were analysed using the Wilcoxon test with P less than 0.05 considered as significant. RESULTS: The subjective audibility scores (inside vs. outside the MRI room) were 9.0 [8.5-10.0] vs. 7 [6.5-8.0]. During MRI scanning, the scores were 6.0 [5.5-7.0] vs. 4.0 [3.5-5.0], respectively (P < 0.001). The sound level measurements were 70 [69-71] vs. 55 [54-57] dB (A). During MRI 91 [91-92] dB (A) vs. 68 [65-69] dB (A) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The audibility of the anaesthesia alarm is significantly reduced during MRI, particularly outside the scanning room. Consequently, optical alarms and interactive screens (outside the room) must be available without exception.
机译:背景与目的:MRI声学噪声对麻醉安全性的影响尚未被证实。这项研究的目的是对MRI期间麻醉警报的可听性进行主观和客观评估,并复习文献以确定是否担心我们的结果。方法:在机构审查委员会的批准下,我们测试了四种麻醉设备警报器的可听性,并选择了其中一种。此外,我们在研究中选择了三个MRI序列(自旋回波)中听得最少的。评估以主观和客观的方式在扫描室内外进行。首先,有20名正常听力同意的成人志愿者使用10点数字量表(0 =听不到,10 =最大听觉)对麻醉警报的可听度进行评分。第二,在上述条件下,使用声级计测量声噪声的强度(A加权标度)。使用Wilcoxon检验分析以中位数[四分位数间距]表示的数据,P小于0.05被认为是显着的。结果:主观听觉评分(在MRI室内部与外部)分别为9.0 [8.5-10.0]和7 [6.5-8.0]。在MRI扫描期间,得分分别为6.0 [5.5-7.0]和4.0 [3.5-5.0](P <0.001)。声级测量为70 [69-71] vs. 55 [54-57] dB(A)。 MRI期间91 [91-92] dB(A)与68 [65-69] dB(A)(P <0.001)。结论:在MRI期间,尤其是在扫描室外,麻醉警报的可听性大大降低了。因此,必须毫无例外地提供光学警报器和交互式屏幕(房间外)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号