...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of anaesthesiology >Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management.
【24h】

Benchmarking as a tool of continuous quality improvement in postoperative pain management.

机译:基准测试是术后疼痛管理中持续质量改善的工具。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Quality of acute pain management is far from being satisfactory. These deficits are not caused by the complexity of the medical problem but by difficulties in organization and hospital structures, sand procedures. Continuous quality improvement is a recommended tool to overcome such difficulties and to increase quality in the long run. This study reports the implementation of benchmarking-based continuous quality improvement to improve postoperative pain management at a university hospital. METHODS: A specialised pain nurse interviewed patients of three surgical departments on the first day after surgery, and continuously assessed process and outcome quality parameters. A multidisciplinary team of anaesthetists, surgeons, nurses and pharmacists implemented a regular procedure of data analysing and internal benchmarking. Results and suggested improvements were fed back to the healthcare teams. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2002, 6,756 patients were assessed. Average pain on ambulation and maximal pain were 3.7 +/- 2.4 and 5.0 +/- 2.5 (mean +/- SD) on a 11-point numeric rating scale. Pain intensity at rest was 1.9 +/- 1.8. Over time, pain intensity on ambulation decreased (P = 0.022) whereas maximal pain and pain at rest remained unchanged. There was an increase in the number of patients who received non-opioid analgesia (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A continuous quality improvement process could be established and is now successfully used in clinical routine. Cornerstones of this project were frequent assessments of process and outcome parameters, regular benchmarking and implementation of feedback mechanisms. Changes in organization of medical management and multidisciplinary teamwork seem to be more important than medical or technical aspects.
机译:背景与目的:急性疼痛治疗的质量远不能令人满意。这些缺陷不是由医疗问题的复杂性引起的,而是由组织和医院结构,沙土处理程序的困难引起的。推荐持续进行质量改进,以克服这些困难并从长远来看提高质量。这项研究报告了基于基准的持续质量改进的实施,以改善大学医院的术后疼痛管理。方法:一名专业的疼痛护士在术后第一天采访了三个外科部门的患者,并不断评估过程和结果质量参数。由麻醉师,外科医生,护士和药剂师组成的多学科团队实施了常规的数据分析和内部基准测试程序。结果和建议的改进反馈给医疗团队。结果:从1998年到2002年,对6,756例患者进行了评估。在11点数字评分量表上,行走时的平均疼痛和最大疼痛分别为3.7 +/- 2.4和5.0 +/- 2.5(平均+/- SD)。静止时的疼痛强度为1.9 +/- 1.8。随着时间的流逝,移动时的疼痛强度降低(P = 0.022),而最大疼痛和静止疼痛保持不变。接受非阿片类镇痛的患者人数有所增加(P <0.001)。结论:可以建立持续的质量改进过程,现已成功地用于临床常规。该项目的基础是经常评估过程和结果参数,定期进行基准测试和实施反馈机制。医疗管理和多学科团队合作的组织变革似乎比医学或技术方面更为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号