...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of applied physiology >Influence of 2D and 3D body segment models on energy calculations during kinematic analysis of running.
【24h】

Influence of 2D and 3D body segment models on energy calculations during kinematic analysis of running.

机译:跑步运动学分析中2D和3D人体分段模型对能量计算的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aims of the present study were: (1) to examine the influence of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) analysis on the body's total energy during the support phase of running, and (2) to examine the influence of the choice of anthropometric models on the body's total energy during running. A total of 14 runners participated in the investigation [mean (SD) height: 1.83 (0.03) m, body mass: 79.67 (5.65) kg]. Two genlocked high-speed cameras (120 Hz) filmed each athlete's movement during single-foot ground contact. The exact support time of the athletes was measured with a Kistler force plate (sampling frequency: 1000 Hz). The masses and moments of inertia of the various segments were estimated using the 2D and 3D models of Hanavan (1964) as well as the 3D model of Zatsiorsky et al. (1984).The influence of the 2D and 3D analysis on the calculations was evaluated by comparing of the total energies calculated using Hanavan's 2D and 3D models. The influence of the choice of the anthropometric model on the calculations was checked by comparing the results obtained using the Hanavan 3D model and those obtained using the 3D model of Zatsiorsky et al. (1984). The data show us that 2D and 3D analyses produce similar energy values during the entire support phase of running (only very small percentage energy differences were observed: e.g. from 0.23% for the energy of the body at the first contact with the ground, up to 0.31% for the energy of the body at the time the athlete leaves the ground, E(TO)). In addition, calculations made using the 3D models of Hanavan and Zatsiorsky also produced similar results for energy values (energy differences from 0.33% for energy minimum, up to 0.8% for E(TO)). It can be assumed, therefore, that neither the choice of the anthropometric model nor the calculations made on the basis of 3D coordinates are limiting factors in the calculation of body total energies for running.
机译:本研究的目的是:(1)在跑步的支撑阶段检查二维(2D)和三维(3D)分析对人体总能量的影响,以及(2)考察影响人体模型在跑步过程中对人体总能量的选择。共有14位跑步者参加了调查[平均(SD)身高:1.83(0.03)m,体重:79.67(5.65)kg]。两个同步锁相高速摄像机(120 Hz)记录了单脚地面接触过程中每个运动员的动作。使用Kistler测力板(采样频率:1000 Hz)测量运动员的确切支撑时间。使用Hanavan(1964)的2D和3D模型以及Zatsiorsky等人的3D模型估计了各个节段的质量和惯性矩。 (1984)。通过比较使用Hanavan的2D和3D模型计算的总能量来评估2D和3D分析对计算的影响。通过比较使用Hanavan 3D模型获得的结果和使用Zatsiorsky等人的3D模型获得的结果,检查了人体测量模型选择对计算的影响。 (1984)。数据显示,在整个跑步过程中2D和3D分析产生的能量值相似(仅观察到很小的能量差百分比:例如,从首次接触地面时人体的能量的0.23%到最高运动员离开地面时身体能量的0.31%(E(TO))。此外,使用Hanavan和Zatsiorsky的3D模型进行的计算也得出了相似的能量值结果(能量差从最小能量的0.33%,到E(TO)的最大0.8%)。因此,可以假设人体测量模型的选择或基于3D坐标进行的计算都不是计算跑步总能量的限制因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号