首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging >Cost-effectiveness of preoperative SPECT/CT combined with lymphoscintigraphy vs. lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node excision in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative SPECT/CT combined with lymphoscintigraphy vs. lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node excision in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma

机译:皮肤恶性黑色素瘤患者术前SPECT / CT结合淋巴显像术与淋巴显像术联合前哨淋巴结切除术的成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Malignant melanoma has become a major growing interdisciplinary problem in public health worldwide. Sentinel lymph node excision (SLNE) in conjunction with preoperative SPECT/CT is considered the most sensitive and specific staging test for the detection of micrometastatic melanoma in regional lymph nodes. Among patients with clinically lymph node-negative melanoma, the use of SPECT/CT-aided SLNE compared with SLNE alone has been found to be associated with a higher frequency of metastatic involvement and a higher rate of disease-free survival. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of SLNE with preoperative SPECT/CT for detecting sentinel lymph nodes versus that of standard SLNE with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy from a single-institution database. Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis of two surgical approaches for SLNE for malignant melanoma at the University Hospital Essen, Skin Cancer Center in Essen, Germany. Between March 2003 and April 2011 464 patients eligible for SLNE were identified . Of these patients, 403 with clinically negative lymph nodes who underwent SLNE with or without preoperative SPECT/CT qualified for subsequent analysis. Results: Between March 2003 and October 2008, 254 patients were operated upon with the standard technique. From November 2008, 149 patients underwent the SPECT/CT technique. Cost analysis showed a mean cost saving of ? 710.50 when SPECT/CT was added to preoperative imaging. This was achieved by a reduction in operative time (median, Q1;Q3, 40 min, 40;50 min, vs. 45 min, 35;60 min; p=0.002), hospital stay duration (5 days, 3;8 days, vs. 8 days, 4.5;14.5 days; p<0.001) and more frequent use of local anaesthesia (90.6 % vs. 70.5 %; p<0.001). The median cost of SLNE using SPECT/CT was ? 1,619.7 (Q1;Q3 ? 1,317.0;2,603.4) and of SLNE without SPECT/CT was ? 2,330.2 (? 1,468.3;4,058.1; p<0.001), a cost saving of 30.5 %. Conclusion: In patients with cutaneous melanoma, the use of preoperative SPECT/CT-aided SLNE compared with standard SLNE was associated not only with higher detection of metastatic involvement but also with a significant cost reduction.
机译:目的:恶性黑色素瘤已成为全球公共卫生领域一个日益严重的跨学科问题。前哨淋巴结切除术(SLNE)结合术前SPECT / CT被认为是检测区域淋巴结微转移性黑色素瘤的最灵敏,最特异性的分期测试。在临床上淋巴结阴性的黑色素瘤患者中,与单独的SLNE相比,使用SPECT / CT辅助的SLNE与更高的转移灶发生率和更高的无病生存率相关。这项研究的目的是从单一机构数据库中分析术前SPECT / CT与前哨淋巴结显像与标准SLNE术前SPECT / CT相比检查SLNE的成本效益。方法:在德国埃森市皮肤癌中心埃森大学医院,对两种SLNE恶性黑色素瘤手术方法的成本效益分析。在2003年3月至2011年4月间,确定了464例符合SLNE的患者。在这些患者中,有403例临床淋巴结阴性且行SLNE术前或未术前SPECT / CT的患者有资格进行后续分析。结果:2003年3月至2008年10月,采用标准技术对254例患者进行了手术。从2008年11月开始,有149例患者接受了SPECT / CT技术。成本分析显示平均成本节省为?术前成像中加入SPECT / CT时为710.50。这是通过减少手术时间(中位数,Q1; Q3,40分钟,40; 50分钟,而45分钟,35; 60分钟; p = 0.002),住院时间(5天,3; 8天)来实现的,而8天为4.5; 14.5天; p <0.001),并且局部麻醉的使用频率更高(90.6%比70.5%; p <0.001)。使用SPECT / CT进行SLNE的中位成本为? 1,619.7(Q1; Q3 = 1,317.0; 2,603.4)和没有SPECT / CT的SLNE为? 2,330.2(?1,468.3; 4,058.1; p <0.001),节省了30.5%的成本。结论:在皮肤黑色素瘤患者中,与标准SLNE相比,术前使用SPECT / CT辅助SLNE不仅可提高转移灶的检出率,而且可显着降低成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号