首页> 外文期刊>European journal of nuclear medicine >Resting state rCBF mapping with single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography: magnitude and origin of differences.
【24h】

Resting state rCBF mapping with single-photon emission tomography and positron emission tomography: magnitude and origin of differences.

机译:静止状态rCBF映射与单光子发射断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描:差异的大小和来源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Single-photon emission tomography (SPET), using technetium-99m hexamethylpropylene amine oxime, and positron emission tomography (PET), using oxygen-15 butanol were compared in six healthy male volunteers with regard to the mapping of resting state regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). A computerized brain atlas was utilized for 3D regional analyses and comparison of 64 selected and normalized volumes of interest (VOIs). The normalized mean rCBF values in SPET, as compared to PET, were higher in most of the Brodmann areas in the frontal and parietal lobes (4.8% and 8.7% respectively). The average differences were small in the temporal (2. 3%) and occipital (1.1%) lobes. PET values were clearly higher in small VOIs like the thalamus (12.3%), hippocampus (12.3%) and basal ganglia (9.9%). A resolution phantom study showed that the in-plane SPET/PET system resolution was 11.0/7.5 mm. In conclusion, SPET and PET data demonstrated a fairly good agreement despite the superior spatial resolution of PET. The differences between SPET and PET rCBF are mainly due to physiological and physical factors, the data processing, normalization and co-registration methods. In order to further improve mapping of rCBF with SPET it is imperative not only to improve the spatial resolution but also to apply accurate correction techniques for scatter, attenuation and non-linear extraction.
机译:在六名健康男性志愿者中,比较了静止状态区域脑血流的分布,比较了使用tech 99m六甲基丙烯胺肟的单光子发射断层扫描(SPET)和使用氧15丁醇的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)。 rCBF)。利用计算机化的大脑图集进行3D区域分析,并比较了64种选定的和标准化的感兴趣体积(VOI)。与PET相比,SPET的标准化rCBF平均值在额叶和顶叶的大多数Brodmann地区更高(分别为4.8%和8.7%)。颞叶(2.3%)和枕叶(1.1%)的平均差异很小。 PET值在丘脑(12.3%),海马(12.3%)和基底神经节(9.9%)等小型VOI中明显更高。分辨率模型研究表明,平面内SPET / PET系统的分辨率为11.0 / 7.5毫米。总之,尽管PET具有出色的空间分辨率,但SPET和PET数据显示出相当好的一致性。 SPET和PET rCBF之间的差异主要是由于生理和物理因素,数据处理,规范化和共同注册方法所致。为了进一步改善rCBF与SPET的映射关系,不仅必须提高空间分辨率,而且还必须将准确的校正技术应用于散射,衰减和非线性提取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号