首页> 外文期刊>European Heart Journal: The Journal of the European Society of Cardiology >Common carotid artery intima-media thickness is as good as carotid intima-media thickness of all carotid artery segments in improving prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.
【24h】

Common carotid artery intima-media thickness is as good as carotid intima-media thickness of all carotid artery segments in improving prediction of coronary heart disease risk in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.

机译:在社区“动脉粥样硬化风险”(ARIC)研究中,在改善对冠心病风险的预测中,颈总动脉内中膜的厚度与所有颈动脉段的颈内中膜厚度一样好。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AIMS: Carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and plaque information can improve coronary heart disease (CHD) risk prediction when added to traditional risk factors (TRF). However, obtaining adequate images of all carotid artery segments (A-CIMT) may be difficult. Of A-CIMT, the common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT) is relatively more reliable and easier to measure. We evaluated whether CCA-IMT is comparable to A-CIMT when added to TRF and plaque information in improving CHD risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten-year CHD risk prediction models using TRF alone, TRF + A-CIMT + plaque, and TRF + CCA-IMT + plaque were developed for the overall cohort, men, and women. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), per cent individuals reclassified, net reclassification index (NRI), and model calibration by the Gronnesby-Borgan test were estimated. There were 1722 incident CHD events in 12 576 individuals over a mean follow-up of 15.2 years. The AUC for TRF only, TRF + A-CIMT + plaque, and TRF + CCA-IMT + plaque models were 0.741, 0.754, and 0.753, respectively. Although there was some discordance when the CCA-IMT + plaque- and A-CIMT + plaque-based risk estimation was compared, the NRI and clinical NRI (NRI in the intermediate-risk group) when comparing the CIMT models with TRF-only model, per cent reclassified, and test for model calibration were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Coronary heart disease risk prediction can be improved by adding A-CIMT + plaque or CCA-IMT + plaque information to TRF. Therefore, evaluating the carotid artery for plaque presence and measuring CCA-IMT, which is easier and more reliable than measuring A-CIMT, provide a good alternative to measuring A-CIMT for CHD risk prediction.
机译:目的:将颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)和斑块信息添加到传统危险因素(TRF)中可以改善冠心病(CHD)的风险预测。但是,要获得所有颈动脉节段(A-CIMT)的足够图像可能很困难。在A-CIMT中,颈总动脉内中膜厚度(CCA-IMT)相对更可靠且更容易测量。我们评估了在社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究中,将CCA-IMT添加到TRF和斑块信息中是否可与A-CIMT相媲美,以改善CHD风险预测。方法和结果:单独使用TRF,TRF + A-CIMT +斑块和TRF + CCA-IMT +斑块开发的十年CHD风险预测模型适用于整个队列,包括男性和女性。估计了接收者操作员特征曲线(AUC)下的面积,个人重新分类的百分比,净重新分类指数(NRI)以及通过Gronnesby-Borgan测试进行的模型校准。平均随访15.2年,共12 576人发生了1722次冠心病事件。仅TRF,TRF + A-CIMT +斑块和TRF + CCA-IMT +斑块模型的AUC分别为0.741、0.754和0.753。尽管在比较基于CCA-IMT +斑块和基于A-CIMT +斑块的风险评估时存在一些不一致之处,但在将CIMT模型与仅TRF模型进行比较时,NRI和临床NRI(中度风险组为NRI) ,重新分类的百分比和模型校准测试没有显着差异。结论:通过在TRF中添加A-CIMT +斑块或CCA-IMT +斑块信息可以改善冠心病的风险预测。因此,评估颈动脉斑块的存在和测量CCA-IMT比测量A-CIMT更容易,更可靠,是测量A-CIMT预测冠心病风险的良好选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号