首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the US
【24h】

Federal policies and local economies: Europe and the US

机译:联邦政策和地方经济:欧洲和美国

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper establishes stylized facts on regional output fluctuations in Europe and the US. Moreover, it proposes a measure of the potential output target of the future European central bank, estimates the potential variance stabilization of a fiscal federation and constructs a regional map of the potential beneficiaries of monetary and fiscal federal policies. The econometric model is an extention of the dynamic factor model a la Sargent and Sims (1977. In: Sims, C.A. (Ed.), New Methods in Business Research. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis) where we introduce an intermediate-level shock, which is common to all regions (counties) in each country (state), but it is not common to Europe (US) as a whole. We build on Forni and Reichlin (1996. Empirical Economics, Long-Run Economic Growth (special issue) 21 (1996) 27-42. Review of Economic Studies 65 (1998) 453-473) to propose an estimation method which exploits the large cross-sectional dimension of our data set. Our analysis shows that (i) Europe has a level of integration similar to that of the US and that national shocks are not a sizeable source of fluctuations: around 75 percent of output variance is explained by global and purely local dynamics; (ii) Europe, unlike the US, has no traditional business cycle; (iii) the core of the most integrated regions in Europe does not have national boundaries; (iv) the future European Central Bank has a potential stabilization target of about 18 percent of total output fluctuations; (v) a fiscal federation, if implemented, could have a smoothing effect on output in addition to what done by national fiscal policy, which accounts also for about 18 percent of total output fluctuations.
机译:本文建立了欧美地区产出波动的典型事实。此外,它提出了衡量未来欧洲中央银行潜在产出目标的措施,估计了财政联合会的潜在差异稳定性,并绘制了货币和财政联邦政策潜在受益者的区域地图。计量经济学模型是la Sargent和Sims(1977. In:Sims,CA(Ed。),《商业研究的新方法》,明尼阿波利斯联邦储备银行)的动态因子模型的扩展,在其中我们引入了中级冲击,对于每个国家(州)的所有地区(县)来说都是通用的,但对于整个欧洲(美国)来说却并不通用。我们以Forni和Reichlin(1996.经验经济学,长期经济增长(特刊)21(1996)27-42。经济研究评论65(1998)453-473)为基础,提出了一种利用大笔投资的估算方法。我们数据集的横截面尺寸。我们的分析表明:(i)欧洲的一体化程度与美国类似,并且国家冲击不是很大的波动来源:全球总产出和纯粹的局部动力可以解释约75%的产出差异; (ii)欧洲与美国不同,没有传统的商业周期; (iii)欧洲最一体化的地区的核心没有国界; (iv)未来的欧洲中央银行的潜在稳定目标约为总产出波动的18%; (v)财政联合会如果实施,除了国家财政政策所采取的措施外,还可能对产出产生平滑作用,而国家财政政策也占总产出波动的约18%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号