首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Innovation Management >DIFFERENT MODES OF OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
【24h】

DIFFERENT MODES OF OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

机译:开放式创新的不同模式:理论框架和实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Starting from the several conceptual and empirical studies about open innovation modes, this paper attempts to integrate them by suggesting a framework which reveals four basic ways to collaborate. Two variables are considered that represent the degree of openness for a company: (i) the number/type of partners with which the company collaborates, briefly labelled as "partner variety"; (ii) the number/type of phases of the innovation process that the company opens to external contributions, briefly labelled as "innovation funnel openness". By crossing these two variables, four basic modes of open innovation are identified: closed innovators, open innovators, specialized collaborators and integrated collaborators. The framework shows its practical validity in an empirical study that is conducted in Italy with the specific aim at verifying whether companies can really be mapped using this framework, i.e. whether the four modes of open innovation can be found in real companies (framework applicability); whether different modes correspond to different companies' strategies, capabilities, organisational and managerial processes (framework explicative power and usefulness). The framework shows that, in some cases, being totally open in innovation activities is not the only and most suitable option, but that different degrees and ways of "openness" can be implemented successfully, as well as the totally closed option.
机译:从关于开放式创新模式的若干概念和实证研究开始,本文试图通过提出一个揭示四种基本协作方式的框架来试图将它们进行整合。考虑了两个变量来代表公司的开放程度:(i)与公司合作的合作伙伴的数量/类型,简称为“合作伙伴种类”; (ii)公司向外部贡献开放的创新过程的阶段数/类型,简称为“创新漏斗开放性”。通过跨越这两个变量,可以确定开放式创新的四种基本模式:封闭式创新者,开放式创新者,专业协作者和集成协作者。该框架在意大利进行的一项实证研究中表明了其实践有效性,其具体目的是验证是否可以使用该框架真正绘制公司的地图,即是否可以在真实公司中找到四种开放式创新模式(框架适用性);不同的模式是否对应于不同公司的战略,能力,组织和管理流程(框架的解释权和有用性)。该框架表明,在某些情况下,在创新活动中完全开放不是唯一且最合适的选择,但可以完全实施不同程度和方式的“开放”以及完全封闭的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号