...
首页> 外文期刊>European Economic Review >Regulation and Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Reference Pricing or Price Cap Regulation?
【24h】

Regulation and Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Reference Pricing or Price Cap Regulation?

机译:药品监管和定价:参考定价还是价格上限监管?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study the relationship between regulatory regimes and pharmaceutical firms' pricing strategies using a unique policy experiment in Norway, which in 2003 introduced a reference price (RP) system called "index pricing" for a sub-sample of off-patent pharmaceuticals, replacing the existing price cap (PC) regulation. We estimate the effect of the reform using a product level panel dataset, covering the drugs exposed to RP and a large number of drugs still under PC regulation in the time before and after the policy change. Our results show that RP significantly reduces both brand-name and generic prices within the reference group, with the effect being stronger for brand-names. We also identify a negative cross-price effect on therapeutic substitutes not included in the RP system. In terms of policy implications, the results suggest that RP is more effective than PC regulation in lowering drug prices, while the cross-price effect raises a concern about patent protection.
机译:我们在挪威进行了一项独特的政策实验,研究了监管制度与制药公司定价策略之间的关系,该实验于2003年为非专利药品的子样本引入了称为“指数定价”的参考价格(RP)系统,取代了现有的价格上限(PC)法规。我们使用产品级别面板数据集来评估改革的效果,该数据集涵盖了政策变更前后前后暴露于RP的药物和仍受PC管制的大量药物。我们的结果表明,RP显着降低了参考组中的品牌价格和通用价格,对品牌名称的影响更大。我们还确定了对未包含在RP系统中的治疗替代品的负面交叉价格影响。就政策含义而言,结果表明,RP在降低药品价格方面比PC监管更为有效,而交叉价格效应引起了人们对专利保护的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号