首页> 外文期刊>EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology >A prospective randomised study of the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in bifurcated coronary lesions (babilon trial): 24-month clinical and angiographic results
【24h】

A prospective randomised study of the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in bifurcated coronary lesions (babilon trial): 24-month clinical and angiographic results

机译:紫杉醇涂层球囊导管在冠状动脉分叉病变中的前瞻性随机研究(babilon试验):24个月的临床和血管造影结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons (pDEB) could be an attractive option to minimise side branch (SB) restenosis in bifurcated coronary lesions. We compared angiographic and clinical outcomes with pDEB plus bare metal stent (BMS) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in de novo bifurcated lesions. Methods and results: This multicentre randomised trial included 108 patients. Sequential main branch (MB)/SB dilatation with pDEB, with provisional T-stenting with BMS in the MB was performed in the pDEB group, and with everolimus DES in the DES group. The primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at nine months. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularisation). In-segment MB LLL was 0.31±0.48 mm in the pDEB group, and 0.16±0.38 mm in the DES group (p=0.15); mean difference was 0.15 mm (upper limit one-sided 95% CI: 0.27 mm; p=0.001; non-inferiority test). LLL in SB was -0.04±0.76 mm in the pDEB group and -0.03±0.51 mm in the DES group (p=0.983). MACE and TLR were higher in the pDEB group (17.3% vs. 7.1%; p=0.105, and 15.4% vs. 3.6%; p=0.045), due to higher MB restenosis (13.5% vs. 1.8%; p=0.027). Conclusions: pDEB bifurcation pretreatment with BMS implantation in MB showed greater LLL (ns) and increased incidence of MACE compared to everolimus DES. Both strategies showed similar results in the SB.
机译:目的:紫杉醇药物洗脱球囊(pDEB)可能是一种有吸引力的选择,可以最大程度地减少分支状冠状动脉病变中的侧支(SB)再狭窄。我们比较了pDEB加裸金属支架(BMS)与药物洗脱支架(DES)在从头分叉病变中的血管造影和临床结果。方法和结果:这项多中心随机试验包括108例患者。在pDEB组中进行pDEB的顺序主分支(MB)/ SB扩张,在MB中使用BMS进行临时T支架,在DES组中使用依维莫司DES。主要终点为在第9个月时的晚期管腔丢失(LLL)。次要终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE:死亡,心肌梗塞或靶病变血运重建)的发生率。 pDEB组的段内MB LLL为0.31±0.48 mm,DES组的段内MB LLL为0.16±0.38 mm(p = 0.15);平均差异为0.15毫米(单侧上限95%CI:0.27毫米; p = 0.001;非劣效性测试)。 pDEB组中SB的LLL为-0.04±0.76 mm,DES组中为-0.03±0.51 mm(p = 0.983)。 pDEB组的MACE和TLR较高(17.3%vs. 7.1%; p = 0.105,以及15.4%vs. 3.6%; p = 0.045),原因是MB再狭窄程度更高(13.5%vs. 1.8%; p = 0.027) )。结论:与依维莫司DES相比,在B中植入BMS的pDEB分叉预处理显示出更大的LLL(ns)和MACE发生率。两种策略在SB中显示出相似的结果。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号