首页> 外文期刊>Eurasian Soil Science >On the 'soil' and 'land''' notions as related to substantiation of the reclamation measures
【24h】

On the 'soil' and 'land''' notions as related to substantiation of the reclamation measures

机译:关于与填海措施的证实有关的“土壤”和“土地”概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent decades, two different notions-"soil" and "land"-are often used as synonyms for the determination of objects for amelioration and agriculture. Frequently, the term "land" fully replaces the term "soil". This circumstance. is related to the misunderstanding of the principal differences between these notions and, more often, to the interests of different institutions. In fact, only soils are real natural and historical formations with specific properties, regimes and fertility. Only soils should be considered as direct objects for reclamation. Ungrounded attempts at using the notion of "land" as a single source of information about the properties of soils for solving the applied problems of amelioration and agriculture may be the reason for serious errors and dangerous ecological consequences.
机译:在最近的几十年中,“土壤”和“土地”这两个不同的概念经常被用作同义词,以确定改善和农业的对象。通常,术语“土地”完全替代术语“土壤”。这种情况。与这些概念之间的主要差异的误解有关,而且更常见的是,与不同机构的利益有关。实际上,只有土壤是具有特定属性,制度和肥力的真实自然和历史构造。仅应将土壤视为开垦的直接对象。为了解决改良和农业的应用问题而将“土地”概念用作有关土壤特性的单一信息来源的不切实际的尝试可能是造成严重错误和危险生态后果的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号