首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >A comparison of treatments of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue: surgical resection combined with external radiation therapy, external radiation therapy alone, and external radiation therapy combined with interstitial radiation.
【24h】

A comparison of treatments of squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue: surgical resection combined with external radiation therapy, external radiation therapy alone, and external radiation therapy combined with interstitial radiation.

机译:舌根鳞状细胞癌的治疗方法比较:手术切除结合外部放射治疗,单独进行外部放射治疗以及外部放射治疗与间质性放射治疗相结合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The outcomes of patients treated at a single institution over a specific time frame using three different therapeutic approaches for cancer of the base of tongue were reviewed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1992 and 1998, 53 patients were treated with curative intent for base of tongue cancer. Seventeen patients underwent surgical resection with postoperative radiation therapy, 16 patients received definitive external radiation therapy only, and 20 patients were treated with external and interstitial radiation, with neck dissection in 16 of those patients. Local control, survival, and functional status were assessed with each approach. RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial local control and survival for the surgically treated patients were 74% and 44%, respectively. The patients treated with external radiation therapy alone had local control of 28% and 5-year survival of 24%. The patients treated with external and interstitial radiation with neck dissection as indicated had 5-year actuarial local control of 87% and survival of 33%. Survival was not statistically different between the three treatment approaches (p=0.0995) but local control was worse in the definitive external radiation group (p < 0.0001). Speech and swallowing function among the long-term survivors was superior in the definitively irradiated patients compared with the operated patients. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, survival and local control was lowest in the patients treated with external radiation alone, however, patient selection likely played an important role. Local control was far better with surgical treatment and with external combined with interstitial radiation but survival remains less than 50% with each approach. Surgical treatment was superior for patients with T4 disease. Functional status was higher in the long-term survivors treated nonsurgically.
机译:目的:回顾了在特定时间范围内使用三种不同的舌根癌治疗方法在单个机构接受治疗的患者的结局。方法和材料:在1992年至1998年之间,对53例舌癌根治性患者进行了根治性治疗。 17例接受了术后放射治疗的手术切除,16例仅接受了明确的外部放射治疗,20例接受了外部和间质性放射治疗,其中16例进行了颈部解剖。每种方法均评估了局部控制,生存率和功能状态。结果:接受手术治疗的患者的5年精算局部控制率和生存率分别为74%和44%。单独接受外部放射治疗的患者局部控制率为28%,五年生存率为24%。如所示,采用颈部夹层进行外部和间质放射治疗的患者,5年精算局部控制率为87%,生存率为33%。三种治疗方法的生存率无统计学差异(p = 0.0995),但确定的外部放射治疗组的局部控制较差(p <0.0001)。与接受手术治疗的患者相比,接受最终照射的患者在长期存活者中的言语和吞咽功能要好。结论:在这项回顾性分析中,仅接受外部放射治疗的患者的生存率和局部控制率最低,但是,患者选择可能起着重要作用。手术治疗和外部结合间质放疗的局部控制效果要好得多,但每种方法的存活率仍不到50%。 T4病患者的手术治疗效果更好。非手术治疗的长期存活者的功能状态较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号