...
首页> 外文期刊>Europe Information Agriculture >PRODUCT SAFETY: COURT RULES AGAINST BEUC IN AIR FRESHENER DISPUTE
【24h】

PRODUCT SAFETY: COURT RULES AGAINST BEUC IN AIR FRESHENER DISPUTE

机译:产品安全:针对BEUC在空气清新剂争议中的法院规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

European consumers'group BEUC and Dutch group Consumentenbond must withdraw their "unsubstantiated" allegations that air fresheners are a health hazard or face a fine of euro 10,000 a day, a court in The Hague ruled on March 8. The decision is a clearvictory for air freshener producer Sara Lee, which had launched the lawsuit against the two organisations after they put out a damaging report in November claiming that air fresheners release carcinogenic substances and present "a real risk to health" (see Europe Information Agriculture 172). BEUC's controversial claims - which have been roundly rejected by the chemical industry - triggered a scandal and led to widespread consumer panic in the EU: in the Netherlands, where the lawsuit was initiated, sales of air fresheners fell by 30% following the allegations.
机译:3月8日,海牙法院裁定,欧洲消费者组织BEUC和荷兰组织Consumentenbond必须撤回其关于“空气清新剂具有健康危害或每天面临10,000欧元罚款”的“没有事实根据”的指控。该决定显然是对空气的胜利清新剂生产商Sara Lee于11月发布了一份破坏性报告后,对这两个组织发起了诉讼,声称这两种空气清新剂释放出致癌物质,并对健康构成“真正的风险”(请参阅​​《欧洲信息农业》 172)。 BEUC的有争议的主张(已被化学工业全面拒绝)引发了丑闻,并在欧盟引起了广泛的消费者恐慌:在提起诉讼的荷兰,空气清新剂的销量在被指控后下降了30%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号