【24h】

Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation.

机译:远程电磁导管导航和消融对用于起搏和除颤的植入设备的干扰。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: Remote magnetic catheter navigation (RMN) may facilitate catheter ablation. However, as the system uses permanent magnets, interference (INF) with devices for pacing [pacemaker (PM)], defibrillation [implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD)], or cardiac resynchronisation [cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)] may occur. We investigated the effects of the RMN system on implanted arrhythmia devices in a prospective series. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prior to RMN-guided electrophysiological procedures, devices were fully interrogated and programmed to VVI 40/min with tachycardia detection off (if applicable). Periprocedural device performance was monitored by 12-lead electrocardiogram, and duration and effect of asynchronous stimulation resulting from INF were evaluated. Following the procedure, devices were again interrogated and system integrity verified. A total of 21 procedures in 18 patients with implanted devices [PM n = 12, ICD n = 3, CRT-pacemaker (P) n = 1, CRT-defibrillation (D) n = 2] were evaluated. No relevant changes in lead parameters or device programming were observed after the procedure. No INF was noted in ICD/CRT-D devices (tachycardia detection off) and in 2 PMs, whereas 10 PMs and 1 CRT-P switched to asynchronous stimulation for 1.8 +/- 0.3 h (63 +/- 13% of RMN duration) without clinical adverse effects. In one patient, ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating in ventricular fibrillation occurred, but no causal relation between INF and VT initiation could be ascertained. CONCLUSION: This prospective data provide no evidence that using RMN in patients with implanted arrhythmia devices may cause persistent device dysfunction. Asynchronous PM stimulation is common without negative clinical consequences. Although a causal role of INF for the VT observed seems unlikely, risks and benefits of RMN utilization should carefully be weighed for each patient with an implanted arrhythmia device.
机译:目的:远程磁性导管导航(RMN)可能有助于导管消融。但是,由于系统使用永磁体,可能会与起搏设备[起搏器(PM)],除颤[植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)]或心脏再同步[心脏再同步治疗(CRT)]产生干扰(INF)。我们以预期的方式研究了RMN系统对植入式心律失常设备的影响。方法和结果:在RMN指导的电生理程序之前,对设备进行充分询问,并在心动过速检测关闭的情况下将其编程为VVI 40 / min(如果适用)。通过12导联心电图监测围手术期设备的性能,并评估INF引起的异步刺激的持续时间和效果。按照该步骤,再次询问设备并验证系统完整性。对18例植入器械的患者进行了总共21项手术[PM n = 12,ICD n = 3,CRT-pacemaker(P)n = 1,CRT除颤(D)n = 2]。手术后未观察到导联参数或设备编程的相关变化。在ICD / CRT-D设备(心动过速检测关闭)和2 PMs中未发现INF,而10 PMs和1 CRT-P切换为异步刺激1.8 +/- 0.3 h(RMN持续时间的63 ​​+/- 13%) ),没有临床不良反应。一名患者发生了室性心律失常的室性心动过速(VT),但无法确定INF与室速开始之间的因果关系。结论:该前瞻性数据没有证据表明在植入有心律不齐设备的患者中使用RMN可能会导致持续的设备功能障碍。异步PM刺激很常见,没有负面的临床后果。尽管似乎不太可能发现INF对VT的因果作用,但应仔细权衡每位植入有心律不齐设备的患者的RMN利用风险和益处。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号