首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy research >Comparison of hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation with high (130Hz) and low frequency (5Hz) on afterdischarges in kindled rats.
【24h】

Comparison of hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation with high (130Hz) and low frequency (5Hz) on afterdischarges in kindled rats.

机译:点燃大鼠高放电(130Hz)和低频(5Hz)对海马深部脑刺激的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Hippocampal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is proposed as an experimental treatment for refractory epilepsy, but the optimal stimulation parameters are undetermined. High frequency hippocampal DBS at 130Hz is effective in both animals and patients with epilepsy. Low frequency stimulation (approximately 5Hz) is assumed to have anti-epileptic properties but the efficacy is highly debated. This animal study compares the effects of both stimulation modalities in kindled rats. Sprague Dawley rats (n=20) were fully kindled according to the Alternate Day Rapid Kindling-protocol. After a baseline kindling period, rats were divided into a high frequency group (HFS, 130Hz, n=11) and a low frequency group (LFS, 5Hz, n=9), both receiving 10 days of continuous DBS. During and after DBS, the seizure susceptibility of all rats was tested and the characteristics of the afterdischarges (ADs) were compared between both treatments. During HFS, AD threshold was higher (p<0.05) and at the stimulated site, AD latency was longer (p<0.01) than during baseline period. During LFS, a similar but smaller change was observed, but did not reach significance. The duration of the AD was not affected by either HFS or LFS. After termination of HFS, the effects on AD latency and AD threshold recovered to baseline. In conclusion, high frequency stimulation at 130Hz is more effective than LFS (5Hz) in affecting excitability in epileptic rats. This is reflected in a higher AD threshold and longer AD latency during application of stimulation.
机译:海马深部脑刺激(DBS)被提议作为难治性癫痫的实验治疗方法,但最佳刺激参数尚不确定。 130Hz的高频海马DBS对动物和癫痫患者均有效。低频刺激(约5Hz)被认为具有抗癫痫作用,但其疗效尚有争议。这项动物研究比较了两种刺激方式对点燃大鼠的影响。根据备用日快速点燃协议对Sprague Dawley大鼠(n = 20)进行完全点燃。在基线点燃期后,将大鼠分为高频组(HFS,130Hz,n = 11)和低频组(LFS,5Hz,n = 9),均接受连续10天的DBS。在DBS期间和之后,测试了所有大鼠的癫痫发作易感性,并比较了两种治疗之间的后放电(AD)特征。在HFS期间,AD阈值较高(p <0.05),而在受刺激部位,AD潜伏期较长(p <0.01)。在LFS期间,观察到类似但较小的变化,但未达到显着水平。 AD的持续时间不受HFS或LFS的影响。 HFS终止后,对AD延迟和AD阈值的影响恢复到基线。总之,在影响癫痫大鼠兴奋性方面,以130Hz进行高频刺激比LFS(5Hz)更有效。这反映在施加刺激期间较高的AD阈值和较长的AD潜伏期。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号