首页> 外文期刊>Epilepsy research >Reporting and analysis of open-label extension studies of anti-epileptic drugs.
【24h】

Reporting and analysis of open-label extension studies of anti-epileptic drugs.

机译:抗癫痫药开放标签扩展研究的报告和分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Open-label extension studies, or follow-on randomised controlled trials (FORCTs) are widely believed to be prone to patient selection biases which may inflate effect estimates. This study investigates the reporting and analysis of efficacy outcomes in FORCTs and critically evaluates the associated underlying assumptions. We propose an alternative method of analysis, in line with that recommended in the analysis of RCTs, the intention to treat (ITT) approach, in which it is assumed that all patients who discontinue treatment are non-responders. METHODS: A systematic review of FORCTs and randomised controlled trials (RCT) of topiramate, levetiracetam and gabapentin as adjuvant therapy in refractory adult epilepsy was conducted. Sample sizes and numbers of responders, along with reported outcomes were extracted. To evaluate the feasibility of the assumptions underlying the various methods of analysis, the most common causes of discontinuation were evaluated. For each FORCT, we compared the reported outcome to the proposed ITT analysis. RESULTS: The 10 FORCT reports identified all excluded from the analysis patients who dropped out of the RCT. Adverse events or inefficacy were the main reasons for treatment discontinuation. Analysis based on the ITT method, led to smaller effect estimates than those reported. For example, a FORCT of levetiracetam reported a responder rate of 43%, which reduced to 28% under an ITT analysis, comparable to an ITT analysis outcome of 26% for the parent RCT. CONCLUSIONS: FORCTs can provide important information about long-term efficacy and tolerability of newer therapies. However, current reporting methods are likely to be misleading as outcomes are reported for the subset of patients continuing with treatment at the end of the FORCT. Since the majority of patients who discontinue treatment do so for reasons associated with inefficacy, an analysis based on the ITT approach more closely reflects the outcomes of the patients.
机译:目的:开放标签扩展研究或后续的随机对照试验(FORCT)被广泛认为容易导致患者选择偏倚,可能会增加疗效估计值。这项研究调查了FORCT中疗效结果的报告和分析,并严格评估了相关的基本假设。根据RCT分析中建议的方法,我们提出了另一种分析方法,即治疗意向(ITT)方法,其中假定所有中止治疗的患者均无反应。方法:系统评价了托吡酯,左乙拉西坦和加巴喷丁作为难治性成人癫痫的辅助治疗方法的FORCT和随机对照试验(RCT)。提取样本大小和响应者数量,以及报告的结果。为了评估各种分析方法所依据的假设的可行性,评估了最常见的中断原因。对于每个FORCT,我们将报告的结果与建议的ITT分析进行了比较。结果:10篇FORCT报告确定了所有从RCT中退出的分析患者。不良事件或无效是停药的主要原因。根据ITT方法进行的分析得出的影响估计比所报道的要小。例如,左乙拉西坦的FORCT报告的有效率为43%,在ITT分析下降低为28%,与ITC分析对母体RCT的分析结果为26%相当。结论:FORCTs可提供有关新疗法的长期疗效和耐受性的重要信息。但是,当前的报告方法可能会产生误导,因为在FORCT结束时报告了继续接受治疗的部分患者的结局。由于大多数中止治疗的患者都是出于无效的原因,因此基于ITT方法的分析更能反映患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号