...
首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Commentary on ' Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathologic T3 disease in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: Implications for prostate brachytherapy'
【24h】

Commentary on ' Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathologic T3 disease in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: Implications for prostate brachytherapy'

机译:关于“直肠内磁共振成像预测格里森评分为7的前列腺癌的病理性T3疾病:对前列腺近距离放射治疗的意义”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

MRI has long been looked to as a potential tool to better select patients for prostate brachytherapy. The rationale is to use MRI to identify patients with substantial extracapsular extension (ECE), for whom brachytherapy is presumably inadequate treatment. Like Dr Pugh et al. (1), I find this rationale logical and compelling. However, there are several problems with the use of current MRI technology for treatment selection.First, after exhaustive imaging-pathology correlative studies, MRI is still widely deemed to be too inaccurate for surgical staging. If it is too inaccurate for presurgical staging, it is hard to believe that it is prime time ready for brachytherapy selection.
机译:长期以来,MRI被认为是更好地选择患者进行前列腺近距离放射治疗的潜在工具。基本原理是使用MRI来识别具有实质性囊外延展(ECE)的患者,据推测这些患者的近距离放射治疗不足。像普格博士等。 (1),我发现这个理由是合乎逻辑的和令人信服的。然而,使用当前的MRI技术进行治疗选择存在几个问题。首先,在详尽的影像病理学相关研究之后,MRI仍被普遍认为对于手术分期而言过于不准确。如果对于术前分期来说太不准确了,很难相信这是选择近距离放射治疗的黄金时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号