首页> 外文期刊>Ethology >Comparative Homing Behaviors in Two Species of Crayfish, Fallicambarus Fodiens and Orconectes Rusticus
【24h】

Comparative Homing Behaviors in Two Species of Crayfish, Fallicambarus Fodiens and Orconectes Rusticus

机译:两种小龙虾,法氏杆菌和锈斑小龙虾的归巢行为比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Homing behaviors are seen across the animal kingdom, with the magnitude and scale of these movements varying to a great degree. Invertebrates, such as crayfish, prove to be excellent models for comparative research, with relatively simple nervous systems that have been extensively studied combined with a rich behavioral repertoire that has been well documented. Here we explore whether two crayfish species (a primary burrower and a tertiary burrower) can home to artificial burrows and if so, whether their homing abilities differ. The two species of crayfish, Orconectes rusticus and Fallicambarus fodiens, were examined for their ability to home to artificial burrows in a laboratory setting. Animals were placed in a homing arena, motivated to search by the presence of food, and subsequently return to the burrows. The movements of each individual crayfish were digitized and analyzed for changes in walking speed, velocity and heading angle relative to burrows, total distance travelled and path turning angles. Crayfish of both species successfully returned home, although F.fodiens had a higher homing success rate than O.rusticus. Detailed kinematic analysis showed that walking speeds almost doubled during homing to burrows and heading angles were significantly closer to zero than on the outward journeys for both species. Path turning angles were significantly lower for O.rusticus than for F.fodiens. These findings indicate that these species of crayfish can successfully home without the visual landmark of burrow chimneys and that the primary burrower (F.fodiens) appears to be more successful with straighter return paths. The differences in these two species to home and the underlying mechanisms of homing may be due to the differences in burrow use with primary burrowers showing more efficient homing than tertiary burrowers.
机译:在整个动物界中都可以看到归巢行为,这些运动的大小和规模在很大程度上都不同。无脊椎动物(例如小龙虾)被证明是进行比较研究的极好模型,其相对简单的神经系统已被广泛研究并结合了丰富的行为举止(已被充分证明)。在这里,我们探讨了两种小龙虾物种(主要穴居人和第三级穴居人)是否可以作为人工穴居的家,如果可以,它们的归巢能力是否不同。在实验室环境中检查了两种小龙虾Orconectes Rustus和Fallicambarus fodiens的住穴能力。将动物放置在归巢区域,根据食物的存在进行搜寻,然后返回洞穴。数字化每个小龙虾的运动,并分析其相对于洞穴的行走速度,速度和航向角,总行进距离和路径转向角的变化。尽管F.fodiens的归巢成功率比O.rusticus高,但两种小龙虾均成功返回家园。详细的运动学分析表明,归巢到洞穴期间的行走速度几乎翻了一番,并且航向角比两个物种的向外航行时都显着接近零。 O.rusticus的路径转弯角明显低于F.fodiens。这些发现表明,这些小龙虾物种可以在没有烟囱的视觉标志的情况下成功归巢,并且主要的穴居人(F.fodiens)在返回路径更直的情况下似乎更为成功。这两个物种的归巢和归巢的潜在机制不同,可能是由于洞穴使用的差异,主要洞穴居民的归巢效率高于第三洞穴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号