首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Outcomes for patients with extraprostatic prostate cancer treated with trimodality therapy, including brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, and hormone therapy
【24h】

Outcomes for patients with extraprostatic prostate cancer treated with trimodality therapy, including brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, and hormone therapy

机译:经三联疗法治疗的前列腺外前列腺癌患者的治疗结果,包括近距离放射疗法,外束放射疗法和激素疗法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of multimodality therapy consisting of hormone therapy (HT), brachytherapy (BT), and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in extraprostatic prostate cancer and identify factors with predictive value. Methods and Materials: Between June 1992 and October 2006, 97 patients with extraprostatic prostate cancer received permanent seed implant BT. Extraprostatic disease was defined by one or more of the following: positive seminal vesicle biopsy (n=56), positive lymph node dissection (n=8), or a clinical tumor stage of T3 (n=48). Treatment consisted of BT alone with 103Pd or 125I (n=4); HT and BT (n=3); BT and EBRT (n=2); or trimodality therapy with HT, BT, and EBRT (n=88). Median followup was 69 (range, 23-182) months. Freedom from biochemical failure (FBF) rates were calculated using the Phoenix criteria. Results: The 7-year actuarial FBF, freedom from distant metastases, disease-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 67%, 82%, 96%, and 81%, respectively. Biologically effective dose (BED) was the only variable significantly impacting FBF rates. FBF at 7 years was 60% vs. 74% for BED below 200 and 200 or above, respectively (p=0.048). Trends toward worse outcomes were noted with increasing Gleason score, with 7-year FBF rates of 86% vs. 71% vs. 55% for scores of 6 or less, 7, and 8-10, respectively (p=0.090). BED was the only significant predictor of FBF in multivariate analysis (p=0.032). None of the predictors were significant in multivariable analyses for the other outcomes studied. Conclusions: Trimodality approach achieves durable biochemical control in most patients with historically poor prognosis T3 prostate cancer. BED above 200. Gy was associated with superior FBF.
机译:目的:评价由激素疗法(HT),近距离放射疗法(BT)和外部放射线放射疗法(EBRT)组成的多模式疗法在前列腺外前列腺癌中的疗效,并确定具有预测价值的因素。方法和材料:在1992年6月至2006年10月之间,有97例前列腺外前列腺癌患者接受了永久性种子植入BT。前列腺外疾病由以下一项或多项定义:精囊活检阳性(n = 56),淋巴结清扫阳性(n = 8)或临床肿瘤分期为T3(n = 48)。治疗由单独的BT和103Pd或125I组成(n = 4)。 HT和BT(n = 3); BT和EBRT(n = 2);或采用HT,BT和EBRT的三联疗法(n = 88)。中位随访时间为69(范围23-182)个月。使用Phoenix标准计算无生化衰竭(FBF)率。结果:7年的精算FBF,无远处转移,疾病特异性生存率和总生存率分别为67%,82%,96%和81%。生物有效剂量(BED)是唯一显着影响FBF发生率的变量。 7年时的FBF为60%,而BED低于200和200或更高时分别为74%(p = 0.048)。随着格里森评分的提高,结果趋向于恶化,7年FBF评分分别为6或以下,7和8-10,分别为86%,71%和55%(p = 0.090)。在多变量分析中,BED是FBF的唯一重要预测因子(p = 0.032)。在其他研究结果的多变量分析中,没有一个预测因子是有意义的。结论:三联疗法方法可对大多数历史较差的T3前列腺癌患者实现持久的生化控制。 BED高于200。Gy与较高的FBF相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号