首页> 外文期刊>Brachytherapy >Predictors of the use of supplemental androgen suppression therapy and external beam radiation in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy in community practice
【24h】

Predictors of the use of supplemental androgen suppression therapy and external beam radiation in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing brachytherapy in community practice

机译:在社区实践中,接受近距离放射治疗的高危前列腺癌男性中使用补充雄激素抑制疗法和外照射的预测指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: We assessed clinical- and practice-related variables associated with the use of trimodality treatment (androgen suppression therapy, external beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy) in a community-based cohort of men with high-risk prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: The study cohort was composed of 1342 men with a prostate-specific antigen level >20. ng/mL, clinical tumor stage T3 or T4, and/or Gleason score 8-10 disease at two community radiation facilities, Chicago Prostate Cancer Center (Chicago PCC) and 21st Century Oncology (21C). Logistic regression multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with trimodality treatment. Results: Of 1342 men treated from 1991 to 2005, 650 (48%) received trimodality therapy. Factors associated with trimodality use include younger age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.95, p<0.0001), increasing prostate-specific antigen (AOR 1.54, p<0.0001), Gleason score 7 (AOR 2.88, p<0.0001), Gleason score 8-10 (AOR 4.28, p<0.0001), clinical category T2 (AOR 1.40, p=0.012), clinical category T3 (AOR 4.84, p<0.0001), and year of brachytherapy (AOR 1.13, p<0.0001). Patients treated at 21C were 4.6 times more likely to receive trimodality therapy (p<0.0001) than Chicago PCC. There was a significant interaction between cardiovascular comorbidity status and site (comorbidity × 21C, AOR 1.74, p=0.025), indicating that less healthy patients were more likely to receive trimodality treatment at 21C than healthy patients and vice versa at Chicago PCC. Conclusions: Younger men and those with more aggressive pretreatment clinical factors were more likely to receive trimodality treatment in this community cohort of men with high-risk prostate cancer. Selection for trimodality use varied significantly by site indicating a need for treatment standardization in the community.
机译:目的:我们在社区高危前列腺癌患者队列中评估了与使用三联疗法(雄激素抑制疗法,体外束放射疗法和近距离放射疗法)相关的临床和实践相关变量。方法和材料:该研究队列由1342名前列腺特异性抗原水平> 20的男性组成。 ng / mL,临床肿瘤分期T3或T4和/或Gleason在8个社区辐射设施(芝加哥前列腺癌中心(芝加哥PCC)和21世纪肿瘤学(21C))中获得8-10的疾病。进行逻辑回归多变量分析以鉴定与三联疗法相关的因素。结果:1991年至2005年接受治疗的1342例男性中,有650例(48%)接受了三联疗法。与三联疗法使用相关的因素包括年龄更小(校正比值比[AOR] 0.95,p <0.0001),前列腺特异性抗原增加(AOR 1.54,p <0.0001),格里森评分7(AOR 2.88,p <0.0001),格里森评分8-10(AOR 4.28,p <0.0001),临床类别T2(AOR 1.40,p = 0.012),临床类别T3(AOR 4.84,p <0.0001)和近距离放射治疗年份(AOR 1.13,p <0.0001)。在21C下接受治疗的患者接受三联疗法的可能性是Chicago PCC的4.6倍(p <0.0001)。心血管合并症状态与部位之间存在显着的相互作用(合并症×21C,AOR 1.74,p = 0.025),表明在健康状况良好的患者中21C接受三联疗法的可能性高于健康患者,反之亦然。结论:在这个社区的高危前列腺癌男性队列中,年轻男性和具有更积极的治疗前临床因素的男性更有可能接受三联疗法。三联疗法使用的选择因地点而异,表明社区需要标准化治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号