...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Entomology >Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Phenology, Diversity, and Response to Weed Cover in a Turfgrass Ecosystem
【24h】

Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Phenology, Diversity, and Response to Weed Cover in a Turfgrass Ecosystem

机译:地表甲虫(鞘翅目:甲科)物候,多样性和对草皮生态系统中杂草覆盖的响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite being fragmented and highly disturbed habitats, urban turfgrass ecosystems harbor a surprising diversity of arthropods. The suitability of turf as arthropod habitat, however, likely depends on the extent and types of pesticides and fertilizers used. For example, moderate levels of weed cover in low-input lawns may provide alternative food resources. We conducted a 2-yr field study to: 1) characterize the ground beetle (Carabidae) species assemblage in turfgrass, and 2) assess the direct and indirect effects of lawn management on carabid communities. Weed cover and beetle activity were compared among four lawn management programs: 1) consumer/garden center, 2) integrated pest management (IPM), 3) natural organic, and 4) no-input control. Nearly 5,000 carabid beetles across 17 species were collected with the predator Cyclotrachelus sodalis LeConte numerically dominating the trap catch (87% and 45% of individuals in 2005 and 2006, respectively). Populations of C. sodalis underwent a distinct peak in activity during the third week of June, whereas omnivorous and granivorous species tended to occur at far lower levels and were less variable over the season. We found no evidence for direct effects of lawn management on carabid species diversity; however, we detected an indirect effect mediated by variation in weed cover. Seed-feeding species were positively correlated with turf weeds early in 2006, whereas strictly predaceous species were not. Thus, turf management programs that lead to changes in plant species composition (i.e., herbicide regimes) may indirectly shape epigeal arthropod communities more strongly than the direct effects of insecticide use.
机译:尽管栖息地零散且受到严重干扰,但城市草坪草生态系统仍保留着令人惊讶的节肢动物多样性。但是,草皮是否适合作为节肢动物栖息地,可能取决于所使用的农药和肥料的范围和类型。例如,低投入草坪上中等水平的杂草覆盖可能提供替代的食物资源。我们进行了为期2年的野外研究,以:1)表征草坪草中的甲壳虫(Carabidae)物种集合,以及2)评估草坪管理对腕甲群落的直接和间接影响。比较了四个草坪管理计划中的杂草覆盖和甲虫活动:1)消费者/园艺中心,2)病虫害综合治理(IPM),3)天然有机物和4)无投入控制。捕食者Cyclotrachelus sodalis LeConte在数字上称霸捕捞圈套(2005年和2006年分别为87%和45%),共收集了17个物种的近5,000只甲虫。 Sodalis种群在6月的第三周经历了一个明显的活动高峰,而杂食性和肉食性种群的发生率往往低得多,并且在整个季节变化较小。我们没有发现任何证据表明草坪管理对腕类物种的多样性有直接影响。但是,我们检测到杂草覆盖率变化介导的间接作用。在2006年初,以种子为食的物种与草皮杂草呈正相关,而严格的早熟物种则没有。因此,导致植物物种组成变化的草皮管理计划(即除草剂制度)可能比使用杀虫剂的直接作用更强烈地间接影响上肢节肢动物群落。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号