首页> 外文期刊>Environmental science & policy >Micro-level crafting of institutions within integrated catchment management: Early lessons of adaptive governance from a catchment-based approach case study in England
【24h】

Micro-level crafting of institutions within integrated catchment management: Early lessons of adaptive governance from a catchment-based approach case study in England

机译:综合集水区管理中机构的微观层面的技巧:来自英格兰基于集水区的方法案例研究中的适应性治理的早期课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been considerable interest and discussion surrounding institutional design and governance in the areas of planning, political studies and policy development and more recently natural resource management. Within England, like much of Europe, an integrated catchment management, called the catchment-based approach (CaBA), has been developed when implementing the European Union (EU) Water Framework Directive (WFD). This is seen as both a driver for stricter standards for water quality and ecological status in water course and encouraging the active involvement of stakeholders and communities in both planning and action. This paper analyses institutional design at the local level from the perspective of two concepts, namely institutional governance and social-ecological systems. The intension is to highlight synergies between the two concepts. Through this a new aspect of institutional design is revealed, the micro-level or 'crafting' of institutions by local actors. The paper identifies criteria that are associated with this aspect and analyses an integrated catchment case study in England. The paper concludes that the current policy approach in England, and potentially elsewhere in Europe, offers potential for the 'crafting' of institutions and at the local social-ecological systems scale this has potential for positive benefits such as great understanding and locally effective governance. Both would assist in achieving policy objectives, such as those of the WFD. The case study utilised an effective participatory approach that was, according to the criteria, robust and transferable in developing an adaptive governance approach. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在规划,政治研究和政策制定以及最近的自然资源管理领域,围绕体制设计和治理引起了极大的兴趣和讨论。在英格兰,与欧洲大部分地区一样,在执行欧盟(EU)水框架指令(WFD)时,已经开发了一种综合的流域管理,称为基于流域的方法(CaBA)。这被视为推动制定更严格的水质标准和水道生态状况的动力,并鼓励利益相关者和社区积极参与规划和行动。本文从制度治理和社会生态系统这两个概念的角度分析了地方层面的制度设计。目的是强调两个概念之间的协同作用。通过这种方式,揭示了制度设计的一个新方面,即地方行为者对制度的微观层面或“技巧性”。本文确定了与此方面相关的标准,并分析了英格兰的一个综合性流域案例研究。本文得出的结论是,英国以及欧洲其他地方的当前政策方法为机构的“设计”提供了潜力,在地方社会生态系统规模上,这具有潜在的好处,如增进了解和地方有效的治理。两者都将有助于实现政策目标,例如世界粮食日。案例研究采用了一种有效的参与性方法,根据该标准,该方法在开发适应性治理方法时是强大且可移植的。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号