首页> 外文学位 >Crafting hierarchical institutions for surface water resource management of the Platte River: A case study for the assessment of institutional performance and transformation.
【24h】

Crafting hierarchical institutions for surface water resource management of the Platte River: A case study for the assessment of institutional performance and transformation.

机译:建立普拉特河地表水资源管理的等级制度:以评估制度绩效和转型为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much of the literature indicates the existence of a common feature of the surface water resource. Those studies emphasize a communal ownership pertaining to the access of the surface water resource. Meanwhile, the concept of "open access" is introduced distinctively to compare with the concept of "common property," that is rooted in the presence of regulatory system, relating to the utilization of the surface water resource. The presence of a regulatory system represents the multiple layers of the regulatory institutions rather than dominance of a single institution to manage the surface water resource.;This research selected the surface water resource of the Platte River in the section of Nebraska for the case study. The particular concern of this research began by identifying the multiple layers of regulatory institutions that are involved in managing the surface water resource of the Platte River. The process of this identification required the explanation of the historical development of the present regulatory mechanism. Hence, the first goal of this research is to identify all enforced major water laws and their institutional mechanisms throughout the utilization history of the Platte River.;The research continued by evaluating the performance of these identified institutional mechanisms in terms of two criteria to measure their successfulness. The first criterion assessed how consistently the institutional mechanisms were structured to carry out the goals of the water laws. But any conclusions pertaining to their successfulness cannot be made unless the performance of the institutional mechanism is evaluated in terms of its ecological consequences. Thus, the second criterion was developed to appraise the ecological consequences that are characterized as "the test of the instrumental efficiency.".;The evaluation of the institutional performance was not only to measure the successfulness of the common resource management systems of each system, but also to characterize the pattern of transformation of the surface water resource management system in response to the on-going socio-economic environment and the ecological environment.
机译:许多文献表明存在地表水资源的共同特征。这些研究强调了与地表水资源获取有关的公共所有权。同时,引入“开放获取”的概念是为了与“公共财产”的概念进行比较,而“公共财产”的根源在于存在与地表水资源利用有关的监管体系。监管体系的存在代表着监管机构的多层而不是单个机构来管理地表水资源。;本研究选择了内布拉斯加州的普拉特河地表水资源进行案例研究。这项研究的特别关注始于确定涉及管理普拉特河地表水资源的多层监管机构。识别过程需要解释当前监管机制的历史发展。因此,本研究的首要目标是在整个普拉特河利用历史中,确定所有已执行的主要水法及其制度机制。成功。第一个标准评估了为实现水法目标而建立的体制机制的一致性。但是,除非根据生态机制的后果评估体制机制的绩效,否则无法得出任何有关其成功性的结论。因此,开发了第二个标准来评估被称为“工具效率测试”的生态后果。。制度绩效的评估不仅是为了衡量每个系统的公共资源管理系统的成功,而且还应描述地表水资源管理系统根据持续的社会经济环境和生态环境而转变的模式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yang, Youngseok.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.;
  • 学科 Agricultural economics.;Environmental science.;Urban planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 页码 445 p.
  • 总页数 445
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:49:18

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号