首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets >Vulnerable plaque versus vulnerable patient: emerging blood biomarkers for risk stratification.
【24h】

Vulnerable plaque versus vulnerable patient: emerging blood biomarkers for risk stratification.

机译:易损斑块与弱势患者:新兴的血液生物标志物,用于风险分层。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Biomarkers are generally considered to be plasma measurements of molecules, proteins, or enzymes that provide independent diagnostic and prognostic value by reflecting an underlying disease state or condition. In the case of coronary heart disease, they must reflect the underlying biology of the vessel wall and in particular, the atherosclerotic process and/or its sequelae. The clinical utility of a biomarker depends on its ability to account for a significant proportion of the disease being evaluated; it should be accurate and reliable; provide good sensitivity and specificity; and be available for widespread application. Data are being accumulated on the potential clinical utility of markers of inflammation, hemostasis and thrombosis, phospholipases, proteolysis and oxidative stress. Whereas C-reactive protein (CRP) emerges as a biomarker in the setting of primary prevention, we have recently found that CRP enhances the endothelial expression of metalloproteinases (MMPs). Regardless of the causality,circulating inflammatory markers have the potential to refine prediction of risk of cardiovascular events. However, a recommendation that they should be added to current risk factor scores is premature, since the benefits and costs of screening with any inflammatory marker require careful evaluation. A multimarker approach to estimate cardiovascular risk either by inflammatory markers and cumulative risk markers obtained from non-invasive tests or both may be superior to assessing a single marker.
机译:通常认为生物标志物是通过反映潜在疾病状态或状况提供独立诊断和预后价值的分子,蛋白质或酶的血浆测量值。在冠心病的情况下,它们必须反映出血管壁的基础生物学,尤其是动脉粥样硬化过程和/或其后遗症。生物标志物的临床效用取决于其在所评估疾病中占重要比例的能力;它应该是准确和可靠的;提供良好的敏感性和特异性;并可以广泛应用。关于炎症,止血和血栓形成,磷脂酶,蛋白水解和氧化应激的潜在临床实用性的数据正在积累。尽管C反应蛋白(CRP)在一级预防中已成为生物标志物,但我们最近发现CRP增强了金属蛋白酶(MMPs)的内皮表达。无论是否存在因果关系,循环炎症标记物都有可能改善对心血管事件风险的预测。但是,将其添加到当前危险因素评分中的建议还为时过早,因为使用任何炎症性标志物进行筛查的益处和成本需要仔细评估。通过炎性标志物和从非侵入性测试或两者获得的累积危险标志物估算心血管风险的多标志物方法可能优于评估单个标志物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号