首页> 外文期刊>Endocrine practice: official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists >Usage patterns of devices designed to support diabetes management: an educational needs assessment.
【24h】

Usage patterns of devices designed to support diabetes management: an educational needs assessment.

机译:设计用于支持糖尿病管理的设备的使用模式:教育需求评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine knowledge, competence, and attitudinal issues among diabetes specialists and primary care providers (PCPs) regarding the use of insulin delivery devices such as insulin pens and insulin pumps and the role of glucose monitoring devices and systems in the care of patients with diabetes. METHODS: A quantitative survey tool was developed that contained 51 questions directed to diabetes specialists and 49 questions directed to PCPs. A 5-point, Likert-type scale or multiple-choice format was used. Data were collected from attendees at live symposia across the United States. Results were analyzed for frequency of response and significant relationships among the variables. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 136 specialists and 418 PCPs. There were higher usage rates for insulin pens among specialists than PCPs, although there were higher usage rates among more experienced PCPs. Regarding glucose monitoring, most specialists and PCPs did not recommend "block checking," which has been commonly thought of as a reasonable compromise checking schedule for patients with type 2 diabetes not using insulin. PCPs who were more experienced and used outside educational resources, such as a certified diabetes educator, and specialists who saw more patients on a weekly basis were more likely to prescribe the use of continuous glucose monitoring. There was a general underuse of continuous glucose monitoring in eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the discordance between PCPs and specialists with regard to advanced knowledge and confidence required for the use of newer technologies for glucose monitoring and insulin replacement. We have identified important remedial opportunities for quality- and performance-based educational interventions.
机译:目的:确定糖尿病专家和初级保健提供者(PCP)关于使用胰岛素输送设备(如胰岛素笔和胰岛素泵)的知识,能力和态度问题,以及葡萄糖监测设备和系统在患有以下疾病的患者护理中的作用糖尿病。方法:开发了一种定量调查工具,其中包含针对糖尿病专家的51个问题和针对PCP的49个问题。使用5点,李克特型量表或多项选择格式。数据是在全美国的现场研讨会上从与会者那里收集的。分析结果的响应频率和变量之间的显着关系。结果:这项调查是由136位专家和418位PCP完成的。尽管经验丰富的PCP的使用率较高,但专家使用胰岛素笔的使用率高于PCP。关于葡萄糖监测,大多数专家和PCP不建议“阻滞检查”,通常认为这是对不使用胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者的合理折衷检查时间表。经验丰富并使用外部教育资源的PCP,例如经过认证的糖尿病教育者,以及每周看望更多患者的专家,更有可能开处方使用连续血糖监测。在合格的患者中,连续血糖监测普遍使用不足。结论:这些发现强调了PCP和专家之间在使用最新技术进行葡萄糖监测和胰岛素替代所需的高级知识和信心方面的不一致。我们已经确定了基于质量和绩效的教育干预措施的重要补救机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号