...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Time requirements and health effects of participation in colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy or computed tomography colonography in a randomized controlled trial

机译:在一项随机对照试验中,通过结肠镜检查或计算机断层扫描结肠镜检查参与结肠直肠癌筛查的时间要求和健康影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background and study aims: Time limitations and unwanted health effects may act as barriers to participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of the study was to measure the time requirements and health effects of colonoscopy and computed tomography colonography (CTC) screening. Patients and methods: This was a prospective diary study in a consecutive sample within a randomized controlled CRC screening trial, comparing primary colonoscopy and CTC screening for average-risk individuals aged 50 - 74 years. The diary ended when all screening-related complaints had passed. Results: The diary was returned by 75 % (241/322) of colonoscopy and 75 % (127/170) of CTC screenees. The median interval between leaving home and returning from the examination was longer for colonoscopy (4 hours and 18 minutes [4:18], interquartile range [IQR] 3:30 - 5:00) than for CTC (2:30 hours, IQR 2:06 - 3:00; P < 0.001). Similarly, the time to return to routine activities was longer after colonoscopy (3:54 hours, IQR 1:48 - 15:00) than after CTC (1:36 hours, IQR 0:54 - 4:42). The duration of screening-related symptoms after the examination was shorter for colonoscopy (11:00 hours, IQR 2:54 - 20:00) than for CTC (22:00 hours; IQR 5:30 - 47:00; P < 0.001). Abdominal complaints were reported more frequently after CTC. Anxiety, pain, and quality of life worsened during the screening process, with no differences between the two examinations. Conclusions: Compared with colonoscopy, CTC screening required less time and allowed screenees to return to their daily activities more quickly. In contrast, CTC was associated with a twofold longer duration of screening-related symptoms. Feelings of anxiety, pain, and quality of life scores were similar during colonoscopy and CTC screening. These results should be incorporated into cost-effectiveness analyses of CRC screening techniques.
机译:背景和研究目标:时间限制和不良的健康影响可能会阻碍大肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与。这项研究的目的是测量结肠镜检查和计算机断层扫描结肠造影(CTC)筛查的时间要求以及对健康的影响。患者和方法:这是一项随机对照CRC筛查试验中连续样本中的前瞻性日记研究,比较了初次结肠镜检查和CTC筛查年龄在50-74岁之间的平均风险个体。当所有与筛选有关的投诉都通过时,日记结束。结果:75%(241/322)的结肠镜检查和75%(127/170)的CTC筛查者归还了日记。结肠镜检查(4小时18分钟[4:18],四分位间距[IQR] 3:30-5:00)比CTC(2:30小时,IQR)从出院到检查返回的中间间隔更长2:06-3:00; P <0.001)。同样,结肠镜检查后(3:54小时,IQR 1:48-15:00)恢复正常活动的时间比CTC后(1:36小时,IQR 0:54-4:42)更长。结肠镜检查(11:00小时,IQR 2:54-20:00)检查后筛查相关症状的持续时间比CTC(22:00小时; IQR 5:30-47:00)短(P <0.001) )。 CTC后更经常报告腹部主诉。在筛选过程中,焦虑,疼痛和生活质量恶化,两次检查之间没有差异。结论:与结肠镜检查相比,CTC筛查所需的时间更少,并使被筛查者可以更快地恢复其日常活动。相反,CTC与筛查相关症状的持续时间延长了两倍。在结肠镜检查和CTC筛查期间,焦虑,疼痛和生活质量得分的感觉相似。这些结果应纳入CRC筛查技术的成本效益分析中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号