首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >How to improve biopsy sampling of bile duct strictures: use small- or large-cup biopsy forceps or imagine another kind of forceps!
【24h】

How to improve biopsy sampling of bile duct strictures: use small- or large-cup biopsy forceps or imagine another kind of forceps!

机译:如何改善胆管狭窄的活检采样:使用小杯或大杯活检钳,或者想象另一种钳!

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We read with interest the article by Ikeda et al. about the use of large-capacity forceps for obtaining tissue in cases with ex-trahepatic biliary strictures [1]. In this study, the authors compared two different sized biopsy forceps in 32 patients with extrahepatic biliary strictures to determine pathologic diagnostic rate, specimen adequacy, and submucosal tissue sampling rates. They found that biopsies obtained using the large-cup forceps (2.4 mm) yielded a significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity than biopsies obtained using the standard small-cup forceps (1.8 mm). This was particularly true in cases with bile duct cancer (92% vs. 50%, respectively). To date, this is the highest rate of diagnosis reported in the literature, where the range is from 43% to 81 % [2-4]. Overall, including patients with extra-hepatic biliary strictures other than bile duct cancer, Ikeda et al. found that large-cup forceps provided a higher pathologic diagnostic rate (70 % vs. 43 %) and were reported to be much better in adequacy and submucosal tissue sampling than small-cup biopsy forceps [1 ].
机译:我们感兴趣地阅读了Ikeda等人的文章。肝前胆管狭窄病例中使用大容量镊子获取组织的研究[1]。在这项研究中,作者比较了32例肝外胆管狭窄患者的两种不同大小的活检钳,以确定病理诊断率,标本充分性和粘膜下组织采样率。他们发现,使用大杯钳(2.4毫米)获得的活检比使用标准小杯钳(1.8毫米)获得的活检产生更高的诊断敏感性。在胆管癌病例中尤其如此(分别为92%和50%)。迄今为止,这是文献报道的最高诊断率,范围为43%至81%[2-4]。总体上,包括胆管癌以外的肝外胆管狭窄患者,池田等。发现大杯钳提供更高的病理学诊断率(70%比43%),并且据报道比小杯活检钳在充分性和粘膜下组织采样方面要好得多[1]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号