首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but not esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy, significantly increases portal venous pressure: direct portal pressure measurements through endoscopic ultrasound-guided cannulation.
【24h】

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but not esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy, significantly increases portal venous pressure: direct portal pressure measurements through endoscopic ultrasound-guided cannulation.

机译:内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影术,而不是食管胃十二指肠镜或结肠镜检查,可显着增加门静脉压力:通过内窥镜超声引导下插管直接测量门静脉压力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Changes in portal pressure during endoscopy have not been previously evaluated. The aims of this study were to assess the effect of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on portal vein, inferior vena cava (IVC), and systemic pressures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five acute experiments were performed on 50-kg pigs utilizing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided catheterization of the portal vein and IVC. Systemic, intra-abdominal, IVC, and portal vein pressures were monitored during colonoscopy, EGD, and ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy. After endoscopy the animals were sacrificed for necropsy. The main outcome measure was pressure change during each type of endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in heart rate or systemic pressure during all endoscopic procedures. Intra-abdominal pressure increased during colonoscopy ( P = 0.02) and ERCP ( P = 0.007). However, mean portal venous pressure was significantly elevated only after the injection of contrast into the common bile duct, reaching its peak value at the time of biliary sphincterotomy (39.0 +/- 15.2 mm Hg vs. 13.4 +/- 3.6 mm Hg at baseline, P = 0.006). Mean peak IVC pressure was also elevated during ERCP, but it did not reach statistical significance (24.0 +/- 10.7 mm Hg vs. 12.6 +/- 4.1 mm Hg at baseline, P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: EGD and colonoscopy did not cause significant changes in portal vein, IVC, or systemic pressures. ERCP with biliary sphincterotomy increased portal pressure with only limited effect on IVC and systemic pressures. These new data indicate a possible connection between ERCP with sphincterotomy and portal pressure, and may be clinically important for patients with liver disease and other causes of portal hypertension who undergo this procedure.
机译:背景和研究目的:内窥镜检查期间门静脉压力的变化尚未得到评估。这项研究的目的是评估食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD),结肠镜检查和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)对门静脉,下腔静脉(IVC)和系统性压力的影响。患者和方法:利用内镜超声(EUS)引导的门静脉导管和IVC对50公斤的猪进行了五个急性实验。在结肠镜检查,EGD和ERCP内镜括约肌切开术中监测全身,腹腔,IVC和门静脉压力。内窥镜检查后,处死动物进行尸检。主要结果指标是每种内窥镜检查过程中的压力变化。结果:在所有内窥镜检查过程中,心率或体压均无明显变化。在结肠镜检查(P = 0.02)和ERCP(P = 0.007)期间,腹腔内压力升高。然而,仅在将造影剂注入胆总管后,平均门静脉压才显着升高,在胆囊括约肌切开术时达到其峰值(基线时为39.0 +/- 15.2 mm Hg,而基线时为13.4 +/- 3.6 mm Hg ,P = 0.006)。 ERCP期间平均IVC峰值压力也升高,但未达到统计学显着性(基线时为24.0 +/- 10.7毫米汞柱,而基线时为12.6 +/- 4.1毫米汞柱,P = 0.06)。结论:EGD和结肠镜检查未引起门静脉,IVC或全身压力的明显变化。胆囊括约肌切开术的ERCP增加门静脉压力,但对IVC和全身压力的作用有限。这些新数据表明ERCP与括约肌切开术和门静脉压力之间可能存在联系,并且对于接受该手术的肝病和其他原因引起的门静脉高压症的患者可能在临床上具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号