首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.
【24h】

Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience.

机译:使用22号或25号针头系统对内镜超声引导下细针穿刺术(EUS-FNA)在胰腺肿块中的效用进行回顾性分析:多中心体验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is now performed routinely in many advanced endoscopy centers and has enhanced the ability to diagnose pancreatic masses. However, there is uncertainty about which needle size is optimal for EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in obtaining cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses. METHODS: All cases that were referred for EUS-FNA for pancreatic masses between February 2001 and June 2007 were reviewed, and patients who underwent EUS-FNA using the 22-gauge and 25-gauge needle system were identified. In patients who underwent surgery, operative histopathological findings were compared with the cytopathological findings from EUS-FNA. RESULTS: A total of 842 patients with pancreatic masses detected on computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed by EUS underwent EUS-FNA with the 22-gauge needle (n = 540) or the 25-gauge needle (n = 302). Results of EUS-FNA cytology findings were compared with the gold standard of surgical histopathological findings or long-term clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FNA were respectively 84%, 100%, 100%, and 49% for the 22-gauge needle compared with 92%, 97%, 98%, and 89%, respectively for the 25-gauge needle. No complications were noted in the 25-gauge needle group, compared with pancreatitis in 2% of the 22-gauge needle group. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective comparative study shows that EUS-FNA with a 25-gauge needle system is a safe and reliable method for tissue sampling in pancreatic masses. The system is more sensitive and has a higher NPV than the standard 22-gauge needle. Our study suggests that perhaps the smaller caliber FNA needle causes less trauma during EUS-FNA and hence less complications. Further studies including randomized trials are needed.
机译:背景和研究目的:内镜超声引导下细针穿刺术(EUS-FNA)现在在许多高级内窥镜中心常规进行,并增强了诊断胰腺肿块的能力。但是,对于胰头肿块的EUS-FNA,哪种针头尺寸最佳尚不确定。我们旨在评估22号和25号针头在获得胰腺肿块的细胞学诊断中的性能。方法:回顾了2001年2月至2007年6月间所有因胰腺肿块接受EUS-FNA手术的病例,并鉴定了使用22针和25针针系统进行EUS-FNA的患者。在接受手术的患者中,将手术组织病理学发现与EUS-FNA的细胞病理学发现进行了比较。结果:总共842例通过计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或磁共振成像(MRI)检出并经EUS确认的胰腺肿块患者,使用22号针头(n = 540)或25号针头进行了EUS-FNA。针(n = 302)。将EUS-FNA细胞学检查结果与手术组织病理学检查或长期临床随访的金标准进行比较。 22号针的FNA敏感性,特异性,PPV和NPV分别为84%,100%,100%和49%,而25号针分别为92%,97%,98%和89%针。在25号针头组中未发现并发症,而在22号针头组中有2%发生胰腺炎。结论:这项回顾性比较研究表明,采用25号针头系统的EUS-FNA是一种安全,可靠的胰腺肿块组织取样方法。与标准的22号针头相比,该系统更加灵敏并且具有更高的NPV。我们的研究表明,较小口径的FNA针可能会在EUS-FNA期间引起较少的创伤,从而减少并发症。需要进一步的研究,包括随机试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号