...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy prices and taxes >ENERGY PRICES, TARIFFS, TAXES AND SUBSIDIES IN UKRAINE
【24h】

ENERGY PRICES, TARIFFS, TAXES AND SUBSIDIES IN UKRAINE

机译:乌克兰的能源价格,关税,税收和补贴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For many years, electricity, gas and district heating tariffs for residential consumers were very low in Ukraine; until recently, they were even lower than in neighbouring countries such as Russia. The increases in gas and electricity tariffs, implemented in 2006, are an important step toward sustainable pricing levels; however, electricity and natural gas (especially for households) are still priced below the long-run marginal cost. The problem seems even more serious in district heating and nuclear power. According to the Ministry of Construction, district heating tariffs, on average, cover about 80 percent of costs. Current electricity prices do not fully include the capital costs of power stations, which are particularly high for nuclear power. Although the tariff for nuclear electricity generation includes a small decommissioning charge, it has not been sufficient to accumulate necessary funds for nuclear plants decommissioning. Despite some progress with price liberalisation in the early 1990s, real prices for energy actually declined from 2000-05. While inflation (the producer price index) grew by 47 percent from 2001-04, prices for electricity, natural gas and heating grew only by 22 percent over the same period. The sharp growth in price for gas imports in 2006 made an increase of domestic prices unavoidable. The National Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) raised gas prices for various consumer groups by 25 percent from May 2006, and by a further 80-85 percent from July 2006. NERC is also gradually raising electricity tariffs with the intention of reaching cost-recovery levels by 2008. At the same time, the government limited the growth of residential gas and electricity tariffs in the Fall of 2006, ostensibly to protect the poorest half of the population.
机译:多年来,乌克兰居民消费者的电,气和集中供热电价很低;直到最近,它们还低于俄罗斯等邻国。 2006年实施的天然气和电力关税提高是朝着可持续定价水平迈出的重要一步;但是,电力和天然气(尤其是家庭)的价格仍低于长期边际成本。在区域供热和核电领域,这个问题似乎更加严重。根据建设部的数据,区域供暖关税平均可支付约80%的费用。当前的电价未完全包括电站的资本成本,而核电的资本成本尤其高。尽管核发电的电价包含少量的退役费用,但仍不足以积累用于核电厂退役的必要资金。尽管1990年代初在价格自由化方面取得了一些进展,但能源的实际价格实际上从2000-05年度开始下降。尽管通货膨胀率(生产者物价指数)在2001-04年间增长了47%,但电力,天然气和供暖的价格同期却仅增长了22%。 2006年天然气进口价格的急剧上涨使国内价格上涨不可避免。国家电力监管委员会(NERC)从2006年5月起将各种消费群体的天然气价格提高了25%,从2006年7月起又提高了80-85%。NERC还在逐步提高电价,以期达到成本回收水平。到2008年。与此同时,政府在2006年秋季限制了住宅用气和电费的上涨,表面上是为了保护最贫困的一半人口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号