首页> 外文期刊>Egyptian Journal of Agronomy >The Use of the Double-sampling Procedure and the Dry Weight Rank Method (DWR) for Herbage Mass and Composition Determination
【24h】

The Use of the Double-sampling Procedure and the Dry Weight Rank Method (DWR) for Herbage Mass and Composition Determination

机译:双重采样程序和干重等级法(DWR)在草本植物质量和成分测定中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

HERBAGE mass was assessed by two methods. The first, was the quadrate method by which herbage mass was assessed to be 314 kg/ha and 394 kg/ha when quadrates of areas lm~2 and 0.5 nr were used, respectively. This method was found to be laborious, destructive and time consuming. The second, was the Double-sampling procedure. Herbage mass was calculated by a linear regression in the form of: Y = a + b X. The results indicated that, the co-efficient of determination (R~2) of the three persons were foundto be 0.97, 0.98 and 0.94 with lm~2 quadrate and they were 0.98, 0.97 and 0.99 with 0.5m~2 quadrate. Herbage mass was calculated to be 308 kg/ha for (lm~2) and 318 kg/ha for (0.5m~2). The results do not show any significant differences between the threepersons and the two quadrate sizes. On the other hand, the Dry Weight Rank (DWR) method was used in conjunction with the Double sampling procedure to assess herbage mass composition. The results show that, these values fall within the range of 0.2 percent and 37 percent of herbage mass composition with lm~2 quadrate size and on the range of 0.1 percent and 55 percent of herbage mass composition with 0.5m2 quadrate size. The combined methods were not laborious, nondestructive and not time consuming. Theywere also considered to be productivity based and they are highly recommended for application in this study area and other similar areas.
机译:通过两种方法评估草料质量。首先是采用方差法,当分别使用面积为lm〜2和0.5 nr的方差分别为314 kg / ha和394 kg / ha时,牧草质量被评估为。发现该方法费力,破坏性且耗时。第二个是双重采样程序。通过线性回归,以以下形式计算草料质量:Y = a + bX。结果表明,三个人的lm的测定系数(R〜2)为0.97、0.98和0.94。 〜2平方,它们分别为0.98、0.97和0.99(0.5m〜2平方)。对于(lm〜2),牧草质量计算为308 kg / ha,对于(0.5m〜2),牧草质量为318 kg / ha。结果显示三人组和两个正方形大小之间没有显着差异。另一方面,干重等级(DWR)方法与双重采样程序结合使用以评估牧草质量组成。结果表明,这些值在1m〜2个正方形大小的草质量成分的0.2%和37%的范围内,在0.5m2个正方形大小的草质量成分的0.1%和55%的范围内。组合方法不费力,无损且不费时。它们也被认为是基于生产率的,因此强烈建议将它们应用在该研究领域和其他类似领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号