首页> 外文期刊>Earth-Science Reviews: The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks >Rill erosion: Exploring the relationship between experiments, modelling and field observations
【24h】

Rill erosion: Exploring the relationship between experiments, modelling and field observations

机译:细沟侵蚀:探索实验,建模与现场观测之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Predicting rill erosion rates for a given discharge and slope minimally requires a model for rill hydraulics that allows the prediction of hydraulic parameters and a model for sediment detachment. Several relationships that describe rill hydraulics and/or sediment detachment within an eroding rill have been proposed and are incorporated into state of the art soil erosion models. In this paper a critical review of the theoretical concepts that are underpinning current rill flow and sediment detachment models is made in the light of recent experimental results. Approaches to define detachment-hydraulics relationship are generally based on developments in alluvial river hydraulics. However, experimental evidence to support the use of these concepts in models of rill erosion is scarce and recent experimental findings suggest that the basic assumptions used to model rill erosion are to some extent flawed. An analysis of empirically collected data on rill hydraulics conclusively shows that the empirical Manning equation does not hold for rill flow and should therefore not be used in rill erosion models. An empirical power law relationship relating velocity to discharges is much better in agreement with available experimental data, both for soils with and without rock fragments. In the absence of vegetation residue and/or other macroscopic, immobile elements such as rock fragments, total shear stress and unit length shear force can be used to predict soil detachment. The use of unit length shear force has the advantage that no information about rill geometry is necessary. The evidence for sediment load and rill flow detachment interaction is somewhat conflicting: the presence of a heavy sediment load appears to restrict rill flow detachment, but the exact form of the relationship between detachment rate and sediment load remains unclear. The effect of the presence of a sediment load on flow detachments under natural conditions is also limited by the nature of the detachment and transporting capacity relationships: on a rectilinear hillslope, transporting capacity increases much more rapidly with discharge than detachment capacity. We propose modifications to the theoretical formulations used in rill erosion models so that they are in better agreement with experimental evidence. Finally, we illustrate the potential of simplified models and conclude that the combination of empirical equations for flow detachment and rill hydraulics leads to results that are consistent with empirical data relating rill erosion rates to topography. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:预测给定流量和坡度下的小溪侵蚀速率,至少需要一个可预测水力参数的小溪水力模型和一个泥沙分离模型。已经提出了描述钻探水力和/或侵蚀钻探中的沉积物分离的几种关系,并将它们结合到现有的土壤侵蚀模型中。本文根据最近的实验结果,对支撑当前小溪流和沉积物分离模型的理论概念进行了严格的回顾。定义支流与水力关系的方法通常基于冲积河水力学的发展。但是,缺乏支持这些概念在小河侵蚀模型中使用的实验证据,最近的实验结果表明,用于模拟小河侵蚀的基本假设在一定程度上存在缺陷。对钻探液压系统的经验收集数据的分析最终表明,经验曼宁方程不适用于钻探流量,因此不应在钻探侵蚀模型中使用。对于有或没有岩石碎片的土壤,与速度与流量相关的经验幂定律关系要好得多,与可用的实验数据一致。在没有植被残留物和/或其他宏观,固定的元素(例如岩石碎片),总剪切应力和单位长度剪切力的情况下,可以用来预测土壤的脱离。使用单位长度剪切力的优点是不需要有关钻头几何形状的信息。沉积物载荷与钻探流分离相互作用的证据有些矛盾:沉重的沉积物负载似乎限制了钻探流分离,但是分离速率与沉积物载荷之间关系的确切形式仍不清楚。沉积物负荷的存在对自然条件下的水流分离的影响也受到水分离能力和运输能力关系的限制:在直线山坡上,随着排放量的增加,运输能力比水分离能力快得多。我们建议对钻探侵蚀模型中使用的理论公式进行修改,以使其与实验证据更好地吻合。最后,我们说明了简化模型的潜力,并得出结论,将流分离和钻探水力的经验方程式相结合得出的结果与将钻探侵蚀率与地形相关的经验数据相一致。 (c)2007 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号