...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of dermatology >Narrow-band UVB vs. broad-band UVB therapy in combination with topical calcipotriol vs. placebo in vitiligo.
【24h】

Narrow-band UVB vs. broad-band UVB therapy in combination with topical calcipotriol vs. placebo in vitiligo.

机译:白癜风中的窄带UVB与宽带UVB疗法联合局部卡泊三醇与安慰剂的组合。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Recently, it has been shown that UVB phototherapy may be more effective than UVA in the treatment of vitiligo. Currently, however, no studies have compared the efficacy of UVB(311 nm) and broad-band UVB therapy. Calcipotriol has recently been reported to be effective adjunctive treatment for vitiligo, enhancing the efficacy of 8-methoxypsoralen plus UVA (PUVA) therapy. Methods Ten patients were enrolled in the study; nine completed the 12 months of therapy. The upper part of the body was treated twice weekly with UVB(311 nm) and the lower part with broad-band UVB. Calcipotriol was applied onto the vitiligo lesions of the right side of the body and placebo on the left side. Repigmentation was documented by photography, planimetry, and Vitiligo Disease Activity (VIDA) score. The quality of life was measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results After 7-16 weeks, six of the nine patients showed initial repigmentation on the side treated with UVB(311 nm). After 6 months of treatment, none of the patients showed repigmentation on the areas treated with broad-band UVB, which prompted us to apply UVB(311 nm) all over the body. At the end of 12 months, two patients showed > 75% repigmentation, two showed 51-75%, two showed 26-50%, and three showed 0-25%. In all patients with progressive vitiligo (seven of the nine patients), disease activity was stopped. Remarkably, vitiligo lesions treated with calcipotriol initially showed delayed repigmentation compared with control areas; however, there was no therapeutic difference between calcipotriol and placebo, both in combination with UVB(311 nm), by the end of the study. The DLQI score improved significantly by an average of 28%. Conclusion UVB(311 nm) therapy was effective in the treatment of vitiligo, whereas broad-band UVB had no effect. Combination with calcipotriol ointment was not superior to UVB(311 nm) monotherapy. The quality of life significantly improved with narrow-band UVB(311 nm) phototherapy.
机译:背景技术近来,已经显示出UVB光疗法在治疗白癜风方面可能比UVA更有效。但是,目前尚无研究比较UVB(311 nm)和宽带UVB治疗的疗效。最近有报道称卡泊三醇是白癜风的有效辅助治疗,可增强8-甲氧基补骨脂素加UVA(PUVA)治疗的功效。方法选取10例患者作为研究对象。九人完成了12个月的治疗。每周用UVB(311 nm)对身体的上部进行两次治疗,而下部采用宽带UVB处理。将卡泊三醇涂在身体右侧的白癜风病变上,并将安慰剂涂在左侧。通过摄影,平面测量法和白癜风疾病活动度(VIDA)分数记录了补色。生活质量通过皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)进行衡量。结果7-16周后,在9例患者中有6例在经UVB(311 nm)治疗的一侧出现了最初的色素沉着。经过6个月的治疗,所有患者均未出现在宽带UVB治疗区域上的色素沉着现象,这促使我们在全身使用UVB(311 nm)。在12个月末,两名患者的色素沉着> 75%,两名患者显示51-75%,两名患者显示26-50%,三名患者显示0-25%。在所有进行性白癜风患者中(9例中有7例),疾病活动被停止。值得注意的是,与对照组相比,用卡泊三醇治疗的白癜风皮损最初显示出延迟的色素沉着。但是,到研究结束时,卡泊三醇和安慰剂之间(与311 nm UVB联合使用)之间没有治疗差异。 DLQI评分平均提高了28%。结论UVB(311 nm)治疗白癜风有效,而宽带UVB无效。与卡泊三醇软膏联合使用并不优于UVB(311 nm)单药治疗。窄带UVB(311 nm)光疗可显着改善生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号