首页> 外文期刊>Educational studies in mathematics >Discussing a philosophical background for the ethnomathematical program
【24h】

Discussing a philosophical background for the ethnomathematical program

机译:讨论民族运动学课程的哲学背景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines the extent to which Wittgenstein's analytical framework may be relevant to philosophical reflection on ethnomathematics. The discussion develops Bill Barton's suggestion that a philosophical basis for the ethnomathematical program should include and explain culturally different mathematics systems, and the coexistence of different conceptions of mathematics and rationality. Wittgenstein's concept of mathematics as normative statements rather than descriptions is introduced to dialogue with ethnomathematics research and its anthropological descriptions of how mathematics is used and propagated in specific practices. It is argued that although the formulations in Wittgenstein's analytical framework alone are insufficient to account for the political character of ethnomathematics, they do provide a starting point for ethnomathematics as a nonmetaphysical version of mathematics.
机译:本文探讨了维特根斯坦的分析框架在何种程度上可能与对民族数学的哲学反思有关。讨论提出了比尔·巴顿(Bill Barton)的建议,即民族运动学计划的哲学基础应包括并解释文化上不同的数学系统,以及不同数学和理性概念的共存。维特根斯坦将数学的概念作为规范性陈述而非描述,引入了与民族数学研究及其关于如何在特定实践中使用和传播数学的人类学描述的对话。有人认为,尽管仅维特根斯坦的分析框架中的表述不足以说明民族数学的政治特征,但它们确实为民族数学作为数学的非形而上学的版本提供了起点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号