...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >On the use of loss-on-ignition techniques to quantify fluvial particulate organic carbon
【24h】

On the use of loss-on-ignition techniques to quantify fluvial particulate organic carbon

机译:关于使用燃烧损失技术量化河流颗粒有机碳

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The fluvial flux of carbon (C) from terrestrial to marine environments represents an important component of the global C-cycle, which can transfer C from the atmosphere to sedimentary storage. Fluvial fluxes of C are also an essential resource for freshwater ecosystems, critical for habitat heterogeneity and function. As such it is crucial that we are able to quantify this flux accurately. However, at present there are a number of different techniques used to quantify concentrations of fluvial C, and these techniques vary in their accuracy. In this article, we compare particulate organic carbon (POC) measurements derived from two commonly-used techniques; a simple combustion and loss-on-ignition (LOI) technique, and an oxidative-combustion and carbon dioxide (CO_2) detection technique. The techniques were applied to water samples collected from 10 contrasting reference-condition, temperate river ecosystems. The POC measurements derived from the LOI technique were up to 16 times higher (average four times higher), than those derived from the oxidative-combustion and CO_2 detection technique. This difference was highly variable both across the different river ecosystems and within each river ecosystem over time, suggesting that there is no simple way of converting the mass measured by LOI to estimates of fluvial POC. It is suggested that the difference in POC measured by these two techniques is a consequence of: (1) the loss of inorganic carbon at LOI combustion temperatures of>425 °C, (2) the potential during the LOI combustion stage to lose hygroscopic and intercrystalline water, not completely driven off by the drying stage at temperatures of<150 °C, and (3) the variable C content of fluvial organic matter, meaning that the simple application of a fixed correction factor to values obtained from the LOI technique may not be appropriate. These findings suggest that oxidative-combustion and CO_2 detection techniques are preferential for quantifying fluvial POC.
机译:从陆地到海洋环境的碳通量是全球碳循环的重要组成部分,可以将碳从大气中转移到沉积物中。 C的河流通量也是淡水生态系统的重要资源,对栖息地的异质性和功能至关重要。因此,至关重要的是我们能够准确地量化此通量。但是,目前有许多不同的技术可用于定量测定河流中C的浓度,这些技术的准确性也各不相同。在本文中,我们比较了两种常用技术得出的颗粒有机碳(POC)测量值;简单的燃烧和失火(LOI)技术,以及氧化燃烧和二氧化碳(CO_2)检测技术。该技术应用于从10个对比参考条件的温带河流生态系统中收集的水样。从LOI技术获得的POC测量值比从氧化燃烧和CO_2检测技术获得的POC测量值高16倍(平均高出四倍)。在不同的河流生态系统之间以及每个河流生态系统中,随着时间的流逝,这种差异变化很大,这表明没有简单的方法可以将LOI测得的质量转换为河流POC的估算值。建议通过这两种技术测得的POC差异是由于以下原因造成的:(1)LOI燃烧温度> 425°C时无机碳损失,(2)LOI燃烧阶段失去吸湿性和结晶水,不能在<150°C的温度下被干燥阶段完全除去,以及(3)河流有机物的可变C含量,这意味着对LOI技术获得的值简单应用固定的校正因子可能不适当。这些发现表明,氧化燃烧和CO_2检测技术优先用于定量河流POC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号