...
【24h】

Defining and measuring braiding intensity

机译:定义和测量编织强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Geomorphological studies of braided rivers still lack a consistent measurement of the complexity of the braided pattern. Several simple indices have been proposed and two (channel count and total sinuosity) tire the most commonly applied. For none of these indices has there been an assessment or the sampling requirements and there has been no systematic study of the equivalence of the indices to each other and their sensitivity to river stage. Resolution of these issues is essential for progress in studies of braided morphology and dynamics at the scale of the channel network. A series (of experiments was run using small-scale physical models of braided rivers in a 3 m x 20 in flume. Sampling criteria for braid indices and their comparability were assessed using constant-discharge experiments,. Sample hydrographs were run to assess the effect or flow variability. Reach lengths of at least 10 times the average wetted width are needed to measure braid indices with precision or the order or 20% or the mean. Inherent variability in channel pattern makes it difficult to achieve greater precision. Channel count indices need a minimum of 10 cross-sections spaced no further apart than the average wetted width of the river. Several of the braid indices, including total sinuosity, give very similar numerical values but they differ substantially from channel-count index values. Consequently., functional relationships between channel pattern and., for example, discharge, tire sensitive to file choice of braid index. Braid indices are sensitive to river stage and the highest values typically occur below peak flows or a diurnal (melt-water) hydrograph in pro-glacial rivers. There is no general relationship with stage that would allow data from rivers at, different relative stage to be compared. At present, channel count indices give the best combination of rapid measurement, precision, and range of sources from which measurements can he reliably made. They can also be related directly to bar theory for braided pattern development. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:辫状河的地貌研究仍然缺乏对辫状格局复杂性的一致测量。已经提出了几个简单的指标,最常用的是两个轮胎(通道数和总弯曲度)。因为这些指数都没有评估或抽样要求,也没有系统地研究这些指数之间的等效性及其对河段的敏感性。解决这些问题对于研究通道网络规模的编织形态和动力学至关重要。 (使用3 mx 20的水槽中的辫状河流的小规模物理模型进行了一系列实验。辫状指数的采样标准及其可比性通过恒定流量实验进行了评估。水文样本运行以评估效果或流量的可变性至少要达到平均润湿宽度10倍的长度才能测量精度或数量级或20%或平均值的编织指数,通道模式的固有可变性使其难以达到更高的精度。至少10个横截面的间距不超过河流的平均湿润宽度,其中一些编织指数(包括总弯曲度)给出了非常相似的数值,但与河道计数指数值有很大出入。在通道模式和例如放电之间,轮胎对编织指数的选择敏感。编织指数对河段和高地敏感极值通常发生在冰川前河的峰值流量以下或日(融水)水位图以下。与阶段没有一般关系,可以比较来自不同相对阶段的河流数据。目前,通道计数指标可提供快速测量,精度和可可靠地进行测量的信号源范围的最佳组合。它们也可以直接与编织模式开发的钢筋理论联系起来。版权所有(C)2008 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号