...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Knickpoint recession rate and catchment area: the case of uplifted rivers in Eastern Scotland
【24h】

Knickpoint recession rate and catchment area: the case of uplifted rivers in Eastern Scotland

机译:Knickpoint衰退率和集水区:苏格兰东部河流隆起的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Knickpoint behaviour is a key to understanding both the landscape responses to a base-level fall and the corresponding sediment fluxes from rejuvenated catchments, and must be accommodated in numerical models of large-scale landscape evolution. Knickpoint recession in streams draining to glacio-isostatically uplifted shorelines in eastern Scotland is used to assess whether knickpoint recession is a function of discharge (here represented by its surrogate, catchment area). Knickpoints are identified using DS plots (log slope versus log downstream distance). A statistically significant power relationship is found between distance of headward recession and catchment area. Such knickpoint recession data may be used to determine the values of m and n in the stream power law, E = KA(m)S(n). The data have too many uncertainties, however, to judge definitively whether they are consistent with m = n = 1 (bedrock erosion is proportional to stream power and KPs should be maintained and propagate headwards) or m = 0(.)3, n = 0(.)7 (bedrock incision is proportional to shear stress and KPs do not propagate but degrade in place by rotation or replacement). Nonetheless, the E Scotland m and n values point to the dominance of catchment area (discharge) in determining knickpoint retreat rates and are therefore more consistent with the stream power law formulation in which bedrock erosion is proportional to stream power. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:拐点行为是了解景观对基础水平下降的反应以及来自复兴的集水区的相应泥沙通量的关键,并且必须纳入大规模景观演化的数值模型中。排水至苏格兰东部冰川均衡上升的海岸线的溪流中的拐点衰退用于评估拐点衰退是否是排放的函数(此处以其替代物,集水区为代表)。使用DS图(对数斜率与对数下游距离)识别拐点。在前向后退的距离与集水区之间发现了具有统计学意义的幂关系。这样的拐点衰退数据可以用于确定流功率定律中的m和n的值,E = KA(m)S(n)。但是,这些数据具有太多不确定性,无法确切地判断它们是否与m = n = 1(基岩侵蚀与水流功率成比例,并且应保持KP并向右传播)一致还是m = 0(。)3,n = 0(。)7(基岩切口与切应力成正比,KP不会传播,但会因旋转或置换而退化)。尽管如此,E Scotland m和n值在确定拐点后退率时指向汇水面积(流量)的优势,因此与基岩侵蚀与水流功率成正比的水流功率定律公式更加一致。版权所有(c)2005 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号