首页> 外文期刊>Educational psychology review >Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008
【24h】

Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008

机译:2003年至2008年女性在教育心理学期刊中的作者人数,编辑委员会成员和编辑人数趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Robinson, McKay, Katayama, and Fan (Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 331-343, 1998) reported that women were underrepresented in terms of authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in the field of educational psychology based on membership trends. More recently, Evans, Hsieh, and Robinson (Educational Psychology Review, 17, 263-271, 2005) reported that women had made gains as editors but had not kept pace with organizational membership in terms of authorships and editorial board memberships. Our goal in this paper was to further examine women's participation in educational psychology journals by extending the datasets of Robinson et al. and Evans et al. The number of female authors per article, particularly those from non-US institutions, has continued to increase. However, consistent with Evans et al., although females are continuing to make numerical gains in both authorships-both primary and secondary-and editorial board memberships, their involvement has not kept pace in relation to membership trends.
机译:Robinson,McKay,Katayama和Fan(《当代教育心理学》,第23卷,第331-343页,1998年)报告说,根据成员趋势,女性在教育心理学领域的作者人数,编委会成员和编辑人数均不足。最近,Evans,Hsieh和Robinson(《教育心理学评论》,第17卷,第263-271页,2005年)报告说,妇女在编辑方面有所收获,但在作者身份和编辑委员会成员方面却与组织成员并驾齐驱。本文的目的是通过扩展Robinson等人的数据集来进一步研究女性在教育心理学期刊中的参与情况。和Evans等。每篇文章的女性作者人数,特别是来自非美国机构的女性作家人数,一直在增加。但是,与Evans等人的观点一致,尽管女性在主要,次要和编辑委员会成员中的作者身份都继续取得数字增长,但她们的参与并没有与成员趋势保持同步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号