...
首页> 外文期刊>Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group >Limits on the validity of infinite length assumptions for modelling shallow landslides
【24h】

Limits on the validity of infinite length assumptions for modelling shallow landslides

机译:对浅层滑坡建模的无限长假设有效性的限制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The infinite slope method is widely used as the geotechnical component of geomorphic and landscape evolution models. Its assumption that shallow landslides are infinitely long (in a downslope direction) is usually considered valid for natural landslides on the basis that they are generally long relative to their depth. However, this is rarely justified, because the critical length/depth (L/H) ratio below which edge effects become important is unknown. We establish this critical L/H ratio by benchmarking infinite slope stability predictions against finite element predictions for a set of synthetic two-dimensional slopes, assuming that the difference between the predictions is due to error in the infinite slope method. We test the infinite slope method for six different L/H ratios to find the critical ratio at which its predictions fall within 5% of those from the finite element method. We repeat these tests for 5000 synthetic slopes with a range of failure plane depths, pore water pressures, friction angles, soil cohesions, soil unit weights and slope angles characteristic of natural slopes. We find that: (1) infinite slope stability predictions are consistently too conservative for small L/H ratios; (2) the predictions always converge to within 5% of the finite element benchmarks by a L/H ratio of 25 (i.e. the infinite slope assumption is reasonable for landslides 25 times longer than they are deep); but (3) they can converge at much lower ratios depending on slope properties, particularly for low cohesion soils. The implication for catchment scale stability models is that the infinite length assumption is reasonable if their grid resolution is coarse (e.g>25m). However, it may also be valid even at much finer grid resolutions (e.g. 1m), because spatial organization in the predicted pore water pressure field reduces the probability of short landslides and minimizes the risk that predicted landslides will have L/H ratios less than 25.
机译:无限斜率法被广泛用作地貌和景观演化模型的岩土成分。假定浅层滑坡无限长(沿下坡方向)的假设通常被认为对自然滑坡有效,因为它们相对于其深度通常较长。但是,这很少有道理,因为未知边缘效应变得重要的临界长度/深度(L / H)比是未知的。我们通过将无限边坡稳定性预测与一组合成二维边坡的有限元预测进行基准比较来建立此临界L / H比,假设预测之间的差异是由于无限边坡方法中的误差引起的。我们测试了六个不同的L / H比的无限斜率方法,以找到临界比率,该临界比率的预测值落在有限元方法的预测值的5%内。我们对5000个合成边坡重复了这些测试,这些边坡具有一定范围的破坏面深度,孔隙水压力,摩擦角,土壤内聚力,土壤单位重量和自然边坡特征的边坡角。我们发现:(1)对于小L / H比,无限边坡稳定性预测始终过于保守; (2)预测总是以25的L / H比收敛到有限元基准的5%以内(即,无限滑坡假设对于滑坡长于深度的25倍是合理的);但是(3)取决于坡度,它们可以以低得多的比率收敛,特别是对于低粘性土壤。流域尺度稳定性模型的含义是,如果网格分辨率较粗糙(例如,> 25m),则无限长假设是合理的。但是,即使在更高的网格分辨率(例如1m)下,它也可能是有效的,因为预测的孔隙水压力场中的空间组织会降低发生短滑坡的可能性,并使预测的滑坡的L / H比小于25的风险最小化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号