...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology: A Publication of the Ecological Society of America >Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate
【24h】

Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate

机译:在有蹄有蹄动物的迁移策略之间,捕食风险和饲料之间的取舍有所不同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Trade-offs between predation risk and forage fundamentally drive resource selection by animals. Among migratory ungulates, trade-offs can occur at large spatial scales through migration, which allows an "escape'' from predation, but trade-offs can also occur at finer spatial scales. Previous authors suggest that ungulates will avoid predation risk at the largest scale, although few studies have examined multi-scale trade-offs to test for the relative benefits of risk avoidance across scales. Building on previously developed spatial models of forage and wolf predation risk, we tested for trade-offs at the broad landscape scale and at a finer, within-home-range scale for migratory and non-migratory resident elk (Cervus elaphus) during summer in the Canadian Rockies in Banff National Park (BNP) and adjacent Alberta, Canada. Migration reduced exposure to wolf predation risk by 70% relative to residents at the landscape scale; at the fine scale, migrants used areas that were, on average, 6% higher in forage digestibility. In contrast, by forgoing migration, resident elk were exposed to higher predation risk, but they reduced predation risk at fine scales to only 15% higher than migrants by using areas close to human activity, which wolves avoided. Thus, residents paid for trying to avoid predation risk with lower forage quality. Residents may have been able to compensate, however, by using areas of abundant forage close to human activity where they may have been able to forage more selectively while avoiding predation risk. Human activity effectively decoupled the positive correlation between high forage quality and wolf predation, providing an effective alternate strategy for residents, similar to recent findings in other systems. Although ungulates appear capable of balancing risk and forage at different spatial scales, risk avoidance at large landscape scales may be more effective in the absence of human-caused refugia from predation.
机译:捕食风险和饲草之间的折衷从根本上推动了动物对资源的选择。在有蹄类有蹄类动物中,通过迁移可以在较大的空间尺度上进行权衡,这可以使捕食逃脱,但也可以在更精细的空间尺度上进行权衡,以前的作者建议,有蹄类动物可以最大程度地避免捕食风险。尽管很少有研究检验多尺度权衡以测试跨尺度风险规避的相对利益,但在先前开发的饲草和狼捕食风险空间模型的基础上,我们在较宽的景观尺度上进行了权衡夏季,在加拿大班夫国家公园(BNP)和邻近的加拿大艾伯塔省的加拿大落基山脉中,对迁徙和非迁徙的本地麋鹿(Cervus elaphus)进行了更精细的家庭范围内的迁移,使狼的捕食风险降低了70在景观尺度上相对于居民而言为%;在精细尺度上,移民所使用的区域平均草料消化率高6%;相比之下,由于放弃了移民,当地居民的麋鹿暴露了o更高的捕食风险,但通过使用接近人类活动的区域,狼人避开了小规模的捕食风险,仅比移徙者高15%。因此,居民为避免草料质量低下的捕食风险付出了代价。但是,居民可以通过使用接近人类活动的大量草料来补偿,在这些地方,他们可以更有选择地进行草料捕捞,同时避免捕食风险。人类活动有效地解除了高草料质量与狼捕食之间的正相关关系,为居民提供了一种有效的替代策略,类似于其他系统中的最新发现。尽管有蹄类动物似乎能够在不同的空间尺度上平衡风险和觅食,但在没有人为的捕食性避难所的情况下,在大景观尺度上规避风险可能更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号